SynthesisJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2023
Ethical and legal implications of gene editing in plant breeding: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing climate adaptation in saffron through CRISPR-based modulation of stress tolerance and photoperiodic flowering control.GM crops & food · 2026Review
- Wheat Biofortification for Enhancing Iron, Zinc, and Protein: The Role of Mutation Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas systems for enhancing chilling tolerance in rice: recent advances and future prospects.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A review of flavonoids at the crossroads of plant defense: integrating biotic and abiotic stress tolerance through AI- and CRISPR/Cas-guided metabolic reprogramming.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Building public trust and acceptance towards spray-on RNAi biopesticides: lessons from current ethical, legal and social discourses.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- Unlocking the potential of 'Egusi' melon (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Advances in understanding plant-pathogen interactions: insights from tomato as a model system.Virusdisease · 2024Review
- Developing benzylisoquinoline alkaloid-enriched opium poppy via CRISPR-directed genome editing: A review.BMC plant biology · 2024Review
- Application of CRISPR/Cas-based gene-editing for developing better banana.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biotechnology policies and regulations must be revised and updated to reflect the most recent advances in plant-breeding technology. New Plant Breeding Techniques (NPBT) such as gene editing have been applied to address the myriad of challenges in plant breeding, while the use of NPBT as emerging biotechnological tools raises legal and ethical concerns. This study aims to highlight how gene editing is operationalized in the existing literature and examine the critical issues of ethical and legal issues of gene editing for plant breeding. We carried out a systematic literature review (SLR) to provide the current states of ethical and legal discourses surrounding this topic. We also identified critical research priority areas and policy gaps that must be addressed when designing the future governance of gene editing in plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.