ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2023
Explainable artificial intelligence model for the detection of geographic atrophy using colour retinal photographs.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection and Management of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Noninvasive Retinal Images and Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- AI-assisted analysis of early fluid dynamics following aflibercept 8 mg in treatment-naïve neovascular AMD.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Ophthalmic Imaging: A Decade in ReviewCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Geographic Atrophy Progression in Clinical Practice Before and After Pegcetacoplan Treatment.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of effectiveness of geographic atrophy automatic segmentation with different imaging methods.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Empowering Portable Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening: Evaluation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for a Smartphone Fundus Camera.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Construction and Interpretability of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model of Electronystagmography-Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Early Screening of Alzheimer's Disease.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
- Discriminative, generative artificial intelligence, and foundation models in retina imaging.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) model for detecting geographic atrophy (GA) via colour retinal photographs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We conducted a prospective study where colour fundus images were collected from healthy individuals and patients with retinal diseases using an automated imaging system. All images were categorised into three classes: healthy, GA and other retinal diseases, by two experienced retinologists. Simultaneously, an explainable learning model using class activation mapping techniques categorised each image into one of the three classes. The AI system's performance was then compared with manual evaluations.
resultsA total of 540 colour retinal photographs were collected. Data was divided such that 300 images from each class trained the AI model, 120 for validation and 120 for performance testing. In distinguishing between GA and healthy eyes, the model demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 97.5% and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 98.4%. Performance metrics like area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC, 0.988) and the precision-recall (AUC-PR, 0.952) curves reinforced the model's robust achievement. When differentiating GA from other retinal conditions, the model preserved a diagnostic accuracy of 96.8%, a precision of 90.9% and a recall of 100%, leading to an F1-score of 0.952. The AUC-ROC and AUC-PR scores were 0.975 and 0.909, respectively.
conclusionsOur explainable AI model exhibits excellent performance in detecting GA using colour retinal images. With its high sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy, the AI model stands as a powerful tool for the automated diagnosis of GA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.