Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057104›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open ophthalmology2023

Non-pharmacological pain relief interventions in preterm neonates undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review.

Iretiola Bamikeolu Fajolu, Iyabode Olabisi Florence Dedeke, Beatrice Nkolika Ezenwa, Veronica Chinyere Ezeaka

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06609252 (The Effect of Breast Milk Odour and Mother's Voice on Pain and Comfort During Retinopathy Examination in Premature Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06609252 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Breast Milk Odour and Mother's Voice on Pain and Comfort During Retinopathy Examination in Premature Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsPain, Breast Milk Odour, ComfortArmsBreast milk odour, Mother voice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iretiola Bamikeolu FajoluPaediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria ifajolu@unilag.edu.ng.ORCID 0000-0003-3045-9616
Iyabode Olabisi Florence DedekePaediatrics, Federal Medical Centre Abeokuta, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Beatrice Nkolika EzenwaPaediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Veronica Chinyere EzeakaPaediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
University of Lagos · NGFederal Medical Centre · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this review was to determine the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for pain management during retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Electronic search of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov (USA) was conducted. Search terms from the research question and inclusion criteria were used to select randomised control trials (RCT) published from January 2000 to May 2023. Relevant data were extracted, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool V.2. Critical appraisal and grading of the quality of evidence were done using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for RCTs and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, respectively.

resultsTwenty-one RCTs were included; 14 used sweet taste, while 7 used modified developmental care, touch or positioning, multisensory stimulation, non-nutritive sucking or music. Six studies on sweet taste and all seven latter studies showed a difference in the pain scores in favour of the interventions. The quality of evidence was however judged low and moderate due to some concerns in the randomisation process, measurement of outcome assessment and selection of reported results domains.

conclusionThe use of gentle touch, nesting, positioning, music, multisensory stimulation and developmental care in reducing pain during ROP screening is promising, however, larger studies designed to eliminate the identified concerns are needed. More evidence is also needed before sweet taste interventions can be recommended in routine practice.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementRetinopathy of PrematurityHumansInfant, NewbornPainSystematic Reviews as TopicChild health (paediatrics)Retina

Identifiers

PMID38057104
PMCPMC10711824
OpenAlexW4389410326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.