Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38056704›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2024

Polygenic Analyses Show Important Differences Between Major Depressive Disorder Symptoms Measured Using Various Instruments.

Lianyun Huang, Sonja Tang, Jolien Rietkerk, Vivek Appadurai, Morten Dybdahl Krebs, Andrew J Schork, Thomas Werge, Verena Zuber, Kenneth Kendler, Na Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Polygenic scores in psychiatric research and clinical practice.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lianyun HuangHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Computational Health Centre, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sonja TangSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jolien RietkerkHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Computational Health Centre, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Vivek AppaduraiInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Center, Sct Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten Dybdahl KrebsInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Center, Sct Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andrew J SchorkInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Center, Sct Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark; Neurogenomics Division, The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona; Section for Geogenetics, GLOBE Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas WergeInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Center, Sct Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark; Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Verena ZuberSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kenneth KendlerVirginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics and Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Na CaiHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Computational Health Centre, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: na.cai@helmholtz-munich.de.

Funding

2/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01MH124851 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOERGLUM, ANDERS, DAVIS, LEA K · 2021 to 2025
$5.4M
Medical Research Council MR/W029790/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) are commonly assessed using self-rating instruments like the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (current symptoms) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF) (worst-episode symptoms). We performed a systematic comparison between them for their genetic architecture and utility in investigating MDD heterogeneity.

methodsUsing data from the UK Biobank (n = 41,948-109,417), we assessed the single nucleotide polymorphism heritability and genetic correlation (r

resultsCorresponding symptoms reported through the PHQ-9 and CIDI-SF have low to moderate genetic correlations (r

conclusionsMDD symptoms assessed using the PHQ-9 and CIDI-SF are not interchangeable; the former better indexes general dysphoria, while the latter is more informative about within-MDD heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMultifactorial InheritancePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedPatient Health QuestionnairePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesUnited KingdomDepressionFactor analysisGeneticsGWASHeterogeneitySymptoms

Identifiers

PMID38056704
PMCPMC11139567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.