Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055888›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2024

Nodal positivity in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: multicentre collaborative study.

Alexandra M Zaborowski, Katie Doogan, Siobhan Clifford, Gavin Dowling, Farah Kazi, Karina Delaney, Himanshu Yadav, Aaron Brady, James Geraghty, Denis Evoy and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra M ZaborowskiDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0894-4079
Katie DooganDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Siobhan CliffordDepartment of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Gavin DowlingDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Farah KaziDepartment of Breast Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Karina DelaneyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Himanshu YadavCork Breast Research Centre, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Aaron BradyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Bon Secours Hospital Cork, Cork, Ireland.
James GeraghtyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Denis EvoyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Jane RothwellDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Damian McCartanDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Anna HeeneyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mitchel BarryDepartment of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Siun M WalshDepartment of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Maurice StokesDepartment of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Malcolm R KellDepartment of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael AllenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Colm PowerDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Arnold D K HillDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Elizabeth ConnollyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Dhafir AlazawiDepartment of Breast Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Terence BoyleDepartment of Breast Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark CorriganCork Breast Research Centre, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Peter O'LearyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Bon Secours Hospital Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ruth S PrichardDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
St. Vincent's University Hospital · IEMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IESt. James's Hospital · IEBeaumont Hospital · IEBon Secours Hospital Cork · IECork University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe necessity of performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been questioned. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of nodal positivity in these patients and to identify clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypN+).

methodsA retrospective multicentre study was performed. Patients with cT1-3 cN0 breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2021 were included. Negative nodal status was defined as the absence of palpable lymph nodes, and the absence of suspicious nodes on axillary ultrasonography, or the absence of tumour cells on axillary nodal fine needle aspiration or core biopsy.

resultsA total of 371 patients were analysed. Overall, 47 patients (12.7%) had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Nodal positivity was identified in 22 patients (29.0%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- tumours, 12 patients (13.8%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 3 patients (5.6%) with hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 10 patients (6.5%) with triple-negative breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that multicentric disease was associated with a higher likelihood of ypN+ (OR 2.66, 95% c.i. 1.18 to 6.01; P = 0.018), whilst a radiological complete response in the breast was associated with a reduced likelihood of ypN+ (OR 0.10, 95% c.i. 0.02 to 0.42; P = 0.002), regardless of molecular subtype. Only 3% of patients who had a radiological complete response in the breast were ypN+. The majority of patients (85%) with a positive sentinel node proceeded to axillary lymph node dissection and 93% had N1 disease.

conclusionThe rate of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients who achieve a radiological complete response in the breast is exceptionally low for all molecular subtypes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAxillaFemaleHormonesHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapySentinel Lymph Node BiopsyHormones

Identifiers

PMID38055888
PMCPMC10763529
OpenAlexW4389450188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.