Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055854›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine2024

Enhanced Scheduling to Improve Resident Continuity in a Family Medicine Teaching Clinic.

Stephen M Carek, Brittany L Farrow, Vicki Nelson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen M CarekPrisma Health, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
Brittany L FarrowPrisma Health, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
Vicki NelsonPrisma Health, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
Prisma Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesContinuity of care is a core concept at the heart of primary care practices. Increased patient-provider continuity of care is associated with better satisfaction scores, better clinical outcomes, decreased hospitalizations and emergency department utilization, improved completion of preventive health services, adherence to medical treatment plans, and improved show rates. Compared to traditional outpatient practices, resident teaching clinics traditionally have lower rates of continuity and face unique challenges in improving continuity given the curricular demands, complex scheduling, and high turnover of providers. The objective of our study was to assess the impact of front office training and new electronic medical record (EMR) scheduling protocols on resident continuity in a family medicine teaching clinic.

methodsFrom July 2021 through May 2022, optimized scheduling through a provider search function in the EMR was implemented in a family medicine teaching clinic. We compared the monthly continuity rates between corresponding months in the prior year and the intervention year.

resultsOver an 11-month implementation process, continuity for resident physicians increased from 36.4% to 64.6% (χ2=675.41, P<.001) using EMR tools and scheduling search functions to improve and sustain continuity over the study period.

conclusionsThis intervention to enhance continuity in a family medicine residency clinic led to rapid and sustained improvement in provider continuity. This result demonstrates that optimization of EMR scheduling with tools and protocols can improve overall continuity. This scheduling process can likely be applied to clinical sites for residency programs across disciplines.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareInternship and ResidencyAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFamily PracticeHumansOutpatients

Identifiers

PMID38055854
PMCPMC10932569
OpenAlexW4388728949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.