Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055778›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2024

The value of plasma metanephrine measurements during adrenal vein sampling.

Richard W Carroll, Brian Corley, Joe Feltham, Patricia Whitfield, William Park, Rowena Howard, Melissa Yssel, Ian Phillips, Simon Harper, Jun Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard W CarrollEndocrine, Diabetes, and Research Centre, Wellington Regional Hospital, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-8336
Brian CorleyEndocrine, Diabetes, and Research Centre, Wellington Regional Hospital, New Zealand.
Joe FelthamDepartment of Radiology, Wellington Regional Hospital, New Zealand.
Patricia WhitfieldEndocrine, Diabetes, and Research Centre, Wellington Regional Hospital, New Zealand.
William ParkUniversity of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9628-9958
Rowena HowardDiabetes and Endocrinology Service, Hutt Hospital, New Zealand.
Melissa YsselDepartment of Biochemistry & Endocrinology, Awanui Labs, New Zealand.
Ian PhillipsDepartment of Biochemistry, Awanui Labs, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Simon HarperDepartment of Surgery & Anaesethesia, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jun YangCentre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Wellington Hospital · NZDunedin Public Hospital · NZGovernment of New Zealand · NZHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The assessment of primary aldosteronism incorporates adrenal vein sampling (AVS) to lateralize aldosterone excess. Current adrenal vein sampling protocols rely on concurrent cortisol measurements to assess successful cannulation and lateralization and may be inaccurate in the setting of autonomous cortisol secretion. We aimed to compare the measurement of plasma cortisol and metanephrine concentrations to assess cannulation and lateralization during AVS. Design: This is a diagnostic accuracy study in a tertiary referral endocrinology department. Methods: Forty-one consecutive patients with confirmed primary aldosteronism undergoing AVS (49 procedures) were included. None had cortisol autonomy. The use of plasma metanephrine-based ratios were compared with standard cortisol-based ratios to assess cannulation and lateralization during ACTH-stimulated AVS. Results: There was strong agreement between a cortisol selectivity index (SI) ≥5.0 and an adrenal vein (AV) to peripheral vein (PV) plasma metanephrine ratio (AVmet-PVmet) of ≥12.0 to indicate successful cannulation of the AV (n = 117, sensitivity 98%, specificity 89%, positive predictive value (PPV) 95%, negative predictive value (NPV) 94%). There was strong agreement between the standard cortisol-based SI and an AV plasma metanephrine-to-normetanephrine ratio (AVmet-AVnormet) of ≥2.0 to indicate successful cannulation (n = 117, sensitivity 93%, specificity 86%, PPV 94%, NPV 84%). There was strong agreement between the cortisol- or metanephrine-derived lateralization index (LI) > 4.0 for determining lateralization (n = 26, sensitivity 100%, specificity 94.1%, PPV 91.6%, NPV 100%). Conclusions: Ratios incorporating plasma metanephrines provide comparable outcomes to standard cortisol-based measurements for interpretation of AVS. Further studies are required to assess the use of metanephrine-derived ratios in the context of confirmed cortisol autonomy. Significance statement: Primary aldosteronism is a common cause of secondary hypertension, and adrenal vein sampling remains the gold standard test to assess lateralization. Cortisol-derived ratios to assess cannulation and lateralization may be affected by concurrent cortisol dysfunction, which is not uncommon in the context of primary aldosteronism. Our study showed comparable outcomes when using accepted cortisol-derived or metanephrine-derived ratios to determine cannulation and lateralization during adrenal vein sampling. Further research is required to validate these findings and to assess the use of metanephrine-derived ratios in the context of confirmed concurrent cortisol dysfunction.

Indexed as

adrenal vein samplingmetanephrinesprimary aldosteronism

Identifiers

PMID38055778
PMCPMC10831578
OpenAlexW4389383560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.