ArticlePloS one2023
The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient-reported measures of physical activity level for older adults in the home care setting: a systematic review and assessment of psychometric properties.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes and Outcome Measures Evaluating Timing of Implant Placement in the Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Pooled it
- The VBHC big picture: an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Enhancing treatment adherence in dialysis patients through digital health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Renal failure · 2025Pooled it
- The 2025 European Cystic Fibrosis Society position statement on physical activity assessment in cystic fibrosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Guideline
- Efficacy of exercise-based prehabilitation for patients undergoing elective spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives regarding the foundations of a patient reported measure for adults receiving Home Enteral Tube Feeding-A Delphi study.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026Article
- Implementation of patient-reported outcomes in personalized lung cancer care: a qualitative study from the perspective of patients and health care providers.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes in a Pituitary Tumor Center of Excellence (PTCOE)-aligned pituitary clinic compared with general endocrinology care.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Routine Quality-of-Life Measurement in Residential Aged Care: Results from a Pilot Study in Australia.The patient · 2026Article
- A Realist Evaluation of the Implementation and Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Four Value-Based Healthcare Programmes.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Current use, Challenges, and Recommendations for Future use.Transplantation · 2026Review
- Advancing the Implementation of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Rehabilitation Learning Health Systems: Insights From the 2024 LeaRRn Summit.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A repository of Singapore validated PROMS: a scoping review.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Using a quality improvement framework to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a patient-reported outcome measure for recovery in an office-based treatment setting for opioid use disorder.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Changes in pain, quality of life, sleep, and mental health after uncomplicated spinal neurosurgery in palestine: a prospective study of patient-reported outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rooting patient-reported outcomes in clinical care: a scoping review on benefits, challenges, and opportunities for patients and clinicians.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of the Arabic medication-related burden quality of life (MRB-QoL) tool in hospital-based medicines optimisation services: A mixed methods feasibility study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Benchmarks after bowel resection in Crohn's disease: implementing clinically meaningful health-related quality of life targets.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Advancing Global Cancer Symptom Science: Insights and Strategies From the Inaugural Cancer Symptom Science Expert Meeting.Oncology nursing forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValue-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on the value of patient outcomes and is achieved by ensuring resources already available are managed to realise the best possible individual and population health outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) measure the impact of illnesses from the patient perspective. We conducted a scoping review to understand how PROMs were implemented and used, and their impact in the context of VBHC.
methodsArksey and O'Malley's overarching framework supplemented by principles from mixed-methods Framework Synthesis were used. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar and reference lists were searched. An a priori data extraction framework was created using the review question and objectives as key domains against which to extract data. Mixed-methods data were organised, integrated and preserved in original format and reported for each domain.
resultsForty-three studies were included with 60,200 participants. Few studies reported a well-developed programme theory and we found little robust evidence of effect. PROMs were universally considered to have the potential to increase patient satisfaction with treatment and services, enhance patient awareness of symptoms and self-management, and improve health outcomes such as quality of life and global health status. Evidence is currently limited on how PROMs work and how best to optimally implement PROMs to achieve the target outcome. Implementation challenges commonly prevented the realisation of optimal outcomes and patients generally needed better and clearer communication about why PROMs were being given and how they could optimally be used to support their own self-management.
conclusionPROMSs have yet to demonstrate their full potential in a VBHC context. Optimal PROMs implementation is poorly understood by clinicians and patients. Future studies should explore different models of PROM implementation and use within VBHC programmes to understand what works best and why for each specific context, condition, and population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.