Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055635›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Digital literacy in undergraduate pharmacy education: a scoping review.

Mashael Alowais, Georgina Rudd, Victoria Besa, Hamde Nazar, Tejal Shah, Clare Tolley

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Considerations for conducting a scoping review in pharmacy education.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  12. Celebrating Eta Berner and her influence on biomedical and health informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mashael AlowaisSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-7662-0117
Georgina RuddSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Victoria BesaSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Hamde NazarSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-5386
Tejal ShahSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, United Kingdom.
Clare TolleySchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-7083

Funding

Qassim University in Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabian Cultural BureauSaudi Arabian Cultural Bureau in the United KingdomUnited Kingdom and Qassim University in Saudi Arabia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesConduct a scoping review to identify the approaches used to integrate digital literacy into undergraduate pharmacy programs across different countries, focusing on methods for education, training, and assessment. MATERIALS AND

methodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, we searched 5 electronic databases in June 2022: MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL. Three independent reviewers screened all articles; data extraction was conducted by 2 reviewers. Any discrepancies were arbitrated by 2 additional reviewers.

resultsOut of 624 articles, 57 were included in this review. Educational and training approaches for digital literacy in undergraduate pharmacy programs encompassed a theoretical understanding of health informatics, familiarization with diverse digital technologies, and applied informatics in 2 domains: patient-centric care through digital technologies, and the utilization of digital technologies in interprofessional collaboration. Blended pedagogical strategies were commonly employed. Assessment approaches included patient plan development requiring digital information retrieval, critical appraisal of digital tools, live evaluations of telehealth skills, and quizzes and exams on health informatics concepts. External engagement with system developers, suppliers, and other institutes supported successful digital literacy education. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThis scoping review identifies various learning objectives, teaching, and assessment strategies to incorporate digital literacy in undergraduate pharmacy curricula. Recommendations include acknowledging the evolving digital health landscape, ensuring constructive alignment between learning objectives, teaching approach and assessments, co-development of digital literacy courses with stakeholders, and using standardized guidelines for reporting educational interventions. This study provides practical suggestions for enhancing digital literacy education in undergraduate pharmacy programs.

Indexed as

Education, PharmacyPharmacyCurriculumHumansLearningLiteracydigital healthdigital literacyeducationelectronic health recordspharmacy students

Identifiers

PMID38055635
PMCPMC10873839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.