Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055551›Full record

ArticleRevista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes2023

Assessment of medical students' Surgery knowledge based on Progress Test.

Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho, Angélica Maria Bicudo, Gerson Alves Pereira-Júnior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho- UNESP - Universidadde Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Botucatu - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-9307
Angélica Maria Bicudo- UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas - Campinas - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-5147
Gerson Alves Pereira-Júnior- FOB/USP - Curso de Medicina de Bauru - Bauru - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-3000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress Testing (PT) is an assessment tool whose use has grown throughout Brazil in the last decade. PT makes it possible to assess the students' knowledge gain throughout the undergraduate course and, for their interpretations to be valid, their items (questions) must have adequate quality from the point of view of content validity and reliability of results. In this study, we analyzed the psychometric characteristics of the items and the performance of students in the content area of surgery from 2017 to 2023. For the analyses, we used the assumptions of Classical Test Theory, Bloom's taxonomy and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. The items were easy (average difficulty index between 0.3-0.4), with fair to good discrimination (discrimination index between 0.3-0.4) and with a predominance of medium to high taxonomy. Reliability remained substantial over the years (>0.6). Students' knowledge gain in surgery was found to be progressive and more important from the 3rd year of the undergraduate course, reaching approximately 70-75% in the 6th year. This measurements framework can be replicated in other contexts for a better understanding of student learning and for qualification of evaluation processes.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalBrazilEducational MeasurementHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38055551
PMCPMC10673584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.