Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055495›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023

Elder abuse: a conceptual analysis.

Renata Clemente Dos Santos-Rodrigues, Gleicy Karine Nascimento de Araújo-Monteiro, Ana Márcia Nóbrega Dantas, Patrícia Josefa Fernandes Beserra, Ronei Marcos de Morais, Rafaella Queiroga Souto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renata Clemente Dos Santos-RodriguesUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba. Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-6832
Gleicy Karine Nascimento de Araújo-MonteiroUniversidade Federal de Alagoas. Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-6518
Ana Márcia Nóbrega DantasUniversidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5729-8512
Patrícia Josefa Fernandes BeserraUniversidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-8280
Ronei Marcos de MoraisUniversidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-8950
Rafaella Queiroga SoutoUniversidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-8497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto analyze the concept of elder abuse and identify its respective antecedents, attributes and consequents.

methodsthis is a conceptual analysis according to Walker and Avant's proposition. The search for the concept was mediated by an integrative review in the LILACS, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and BDENF databases.

resultsas antecedents, female, family member, low social support and low income or socioeconomic conditions stand out. Attributes were threats and/or intimidation, intentional use of physical force, using resources without authorization, unwanted sexual activity, offering low insufficient amount of nutrients for older adults and not meeting older adults' affective/emotional needs. Consequents were psychological disorders, dependence on aggressors, environment of insecurity and damage/loss of human rights or human dignity. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the phenomenon under discussion is broad and multifaceted, suggesting expansion of studies related to the theme in order to explore it in detail.

Indexed as

Elder AbuseAgedFamilyFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID38055495
PMCPMC10695070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.