Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055449›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2023

Monitoring of antibody levels in healthcare workers after inactivated coronavirus disease 19 vaccination.

Emel Çalişkan, Cihadiye Elif Öztürk, Şükrü Öksüz, Nevin Ince, Dilek Yekenkurul, Gözde Kahraman, Pelin Duran, İdris Şahin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emel ÇalişkanDüzce University, Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Medical Microbiology - Düzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-7865
Cihadiye Elif ÖztürkArel University, Medical Faculty, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Disease - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4330-2864
Şükrü ÖksüzDüzce University, Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Medical Microbiology - Düzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4893-5564
Nevin InceDüzce University, Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Disease - Düzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0129-4536
Dilek YekenkurulDüzce University, Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Disease - Düzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-7485
Gözde KahramanDüzce University, Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Medical Microbiology - Düzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-164X
Pelin DuranDüzce University, Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Medical Microbiology - Düzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7838-2067
İdris ŞahinDüzce University, Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Medical Microbiology - Düzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-5039
Düzce Üniversitesi · TRIstanbul Arel University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBecause of the coronavirus disease 19 pandemic, studies on vaccination are being conducted in our country as well as across the world. In this study, the antibody levels in healthcare workers vaccinated with two doses of inactivated vaccine and the factors affecting these levels were investigated.

methodsRandomly selected volunteers from healthcare workers, who had been vaccinated with two doses of inactivated vaccine in January to February 2021, were included in the study. Blood samples were drawn twice, 1 month and 6 months after the second dose vaccine (CoronaVac:Sinovac Life Science Co, Ltd, Beijing, China). The antibody levels were determined by the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay method using kits for quantitative detection of immunoglobulin class G antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

resultsThe mean antibody levels of 129 volunteers were 1232.5 (min: 103 to max: 7151) AU/mL in the first month and 403.5 (min: 23 to max: 4963) AU/mL in the sixth month. According to the survey results, 91 (71%) volunteers had not been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 19 before vaccination. The antibody levels 1 month and 6 months after the second dose of vaccination were significantly higher in those who had been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 19 before vaccination than in those who had not. It was found that age, gender, fast food, or healthy nutrition had no effect on antibody levels.

conclusionVaccines are very important both to protect against coronavirus disease 19 and to experience only a mild form of the disease. Immunoglobulin class G levels formed after vaccination may be affected by many factors and may decrease over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin IsotypesVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin Isotypessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID38055449
PMCPMC10691365
OpenAlexW4388972644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.