Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055315›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2023

Self-Guided Mental Health Apps Targeting Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups: Scoping Review.

Fiby Saad, Mia Eisenstadt, Shaun Liverpool, Courtney Carlsson, Isabella Vainieri

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fiby SaadClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0360-5352
Mia EisenstadtClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-9082
Shaun LiverpoolClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-8552
Courtney CarlssonParadym, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-1790
Isabella VainieriClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-2345
Anna Freud Centre · GBEdge Hill University · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of mental health apps (MHAs) is increasing rapidly. However, little is known about the use of MHAs by racial and ethnic minority groups.

objectiveIn this review, we aimed to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of MHAs among racial and ethnic minority groups, describe the purposes of using MHAs, identify the barriers to MHA use in racial and ethnic minority groups, and identify the gaps in the literature.

methodsA systematic search was conducted on August 25, 2023, using Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, PsycExtra, and MEDLINE. Articles were quality appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and data were extracted and summarized to form a narrative synthesis.

resultsA total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were primarily conducted in the United States, and the MHAs designed for racial and ethnic minority groups included ¡Aptívate!, iBobbly, AIMhi- Y, BRAVE, Build Your Own Theme Song, Mindful You, Sanadak, and 12 more MHAs used in 1 study. The MHAs were predominantly informed by cognitive behavioral therapy and focused on reducing depressive symptoms. MHAs were considered acceptable for racial and ethnic minority groups; however, engagement rates dropped over time. Only 2 studies quantitatively reported the effectiveness of MHAs among racial and ethnic minority groups. Barriers to use included the repetitiveness of the MHAs, stigma, lack of personalization, and technical issues.

conclusionsConsidering the growing interest in MHAs, the available evidence for MHAs for racial and ethnic minority groups appears limited. Although the acceptability seems consistent, more research is needed to support the effectiveness of MHAs. Future research should also prioritize studies to explore the specific needs of racial and ethnic minority groups if MHAs are to be successfully adopted.

Indexed as

culturally appropriate technologymental healthmental health appsracial and ethnic minority groupsself-guided

Identifiers

PMID38055315
PMCPMC10733819
OpenAlexW4387850420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.