Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055237›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2024

Multifaceted Strategy Based on Automated Text Messaging After a Recent Heart Failure Admission: The MESSAGE-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Luis E Rohde, Marciane M Rover, Conrado R Hoffmann Filho, Eneida Rejane Rabelo-Silva, Odilson M Silvestre, Silvia M Martins, Luiz C S Passos, José A de Figueiredo Neto, Luiz C Danzmann, Fábio S Silveira and 32 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04062461 (A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self-care Promotion in Patients With Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04062461 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self-care Promotion in Patients With Heart Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital do CoracaoRan2019 to 2023Enrolled704ConditionsHeart FailureArmsMultifaceted strategy based on sending text messages(SMS), Usual outpatient care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors.

Luis E RohdeCardiovascular Division, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Marciane M RoverInstituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Conrado R Hoffmann FilhoHospital Regional Hans Dieter Schmidt, Joinville, Brazil.
Eneida Rejane Rabelo-SilvaHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre e Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Odilson M SilvestreHospital Silvestre Santé, Rio Branco, Brazil.
Silvia M MartinsPronto Socorro Cardiológico de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Luiz C S PassosHospital Ana Nery, Salvador, Brazil.
José A de Figueiredo NetoHospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luiz, Brazil.
Luiz C DanzmannHospital Universitário de Canoas e Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, Brazil.
Fábio S SilveiraClínica do Coração de Aracaju, Aracaju, Brazil.
Cezar Eumann MesasHospital Universitário Regional do Norte do Paraná, Londrina, Brazil.
Mauro E HernandesSanta Casa de Votuporanga, Votuporanga, Brazil.
Lidia Z MouraHospital Universitário do Cajuru, Curitiba, Brazil.
Marcus V SimõesHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Luiz E F RittInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Hospital Cárdio Pulmonar, Salvador, Brazil.
Fábio Akio NishijukaHospital Naval Marcílio Dias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eduardo G BertoldiHospital Escola Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Frederico T C Dall OrtoHospital Maternidade e Pronto Socorro Santa Lúcia, Poços de Caldas, Brazil.
Ellen Hettwer MagedanzHospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ricardo Mourilhe-RochaHospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Miguel M Fernandes-SilvaQuanta Diagnóstico por Imagem, Curitiba, Brazil.
Almir Sergio FerrazInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro SchwartzmannCentro Avançado de Pesquisa e Ensino e Hospital Unimed de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Fábio M de CastilhoHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Antonio Carlos Pereira BarrettoCasa de Saúde Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edval Gomes Dos Santos JúniorInstituto Cárdio-Pulmonar, Feira de Santana, Brazil.
Paulo Roberto NogueiraHospital de Base, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.
Manoel CanesinHospital Universitário Regional do Norte do Paraná, Londrina, Brazil.
Luis Beck-da-SilvaCardiovascular Division, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Maísa de Carvalho SilvaKidopi-Soluções em Informática Médica, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Mario Sergio Adolfi JúniorKidopi-Soluções em Informática Médica, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Renato H N SantosHcor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amanda FerreiraCardiovascular Division, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Danielle PereiraCardiovascular Division, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Leticia López PedrazaCardiovascular Division, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Flávia C S KojimaHcor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Viviane CamposHcor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro G M de Barros E SilvaHcor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana BlacherCardiovascular Division, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alexandre B CavalcantiHcor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felix RamiresHcor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
MESSAGE-HF Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Readmissions after an index heart failure (HF) hospitalization are a major contemporary health care problem. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an intensive telemonitoring strategy in the vulnerable period after an HF hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in 30 HF clinics in Brazil. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% and access to mobile phones were enrolled up to 30 days after an HF admission. Data were collected from July 2019 to July 2022. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to a telemonitoring strategy or standard care. The telemonitoring group received 4 daily short message service text messages to optimize self-care, active engagement, and early intervention. Red flags based on feedback messages triggered automatic diuretic adjustment and/or a telephone call from the health care team. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to 180 days. A hierarchical win-ratio analysis incorporating blindly adjudicated clinical events (cardiovascular deaths and HF hospitalization) and variation in NT-proBNP was also performed. Results: Of 699 included patients, 460 (65.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 61.2 (14.5) years. A total of 352 patients were randomly assigned to the telemonitoring strategy and 347 to standard care. Satisfaction with the telemonitoring strategy was excellent (net promoting score at 180 days, 78.5). HF self-care increased significantly in the telemonitoring group compared with the standard care group (score difference at 30 days, -2.21; 95% CI, -3.67 to -0.74; P = .001; score difference at 180 days, -2.08; 95% CI, -3.59 to -0.57; P = .004). Variation of NT-proBNP was similar in the telemonitoring group compared with the standard care group (telemonitoring: baseline, 2593 pg/mL; 95% CI, 2314-2923; 180 days, 1313 pg/mL; 95% CI, 1117-1543; standard care: baseline, 2396 pg/mL; 95% CI, 2122-2721; 180 days, 1319 pg/mL; 95% CI, 1114-1564; ratio of change, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.11; P = .39). Hierarchical analysis of the composite outcome demonstrated a similar number of wins in both groups (telemonitoring, 49 883 of 122 144 comparisons [40.8%]; standard care, 48 034 of 122 144 comparisons [39.3%]; win ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86-1.26). Conclusions and Relevance: An intensive telemonitoring strategy applied in the vulnerable period after an HF admission was feasible, well-accepted, and increased scores of HF self-care but did not translate to reductions in NT-proBNP levels nor improvement in a composite hierarchical clinical outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04062461.

Indexed as

Heart FailureText MessagingFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID38055237
PMCPMC10701668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.