Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055165›Full record

ReviewInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology2024

Antimicrobial use and resistance in food animal production: food safety and associated concerns in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Timothy Obiebe Jason Odey, Williams Omotola Tanimowo, Kayode Olayinka Afolabi, Iqbal Kabir Jahid, Rine Christopher Reuben

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of carbapenem-resistantPathogens and global health
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multidrug-Resistant and Potentially PathogenicFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy Obiebe Jason OdeyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural, Applied, and Health Sciences, Anchor University, Lagos, Nigeria.
Williams Omotola TanimowoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural, Applied, and Health Sciences, Anchor University, Lagos, Nigeria.
Kayode Olayinka AfolabiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural, Applied, and Health Sciences, Anchor University, Lagos, Nigeria.
Iqbal Kabir JahidDepartment of Microbiology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Rine Christopher ReubenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural, Applied, and Health Sciences, Anchor University, Lagos, Nigeria. reubenrine@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8084-2387
University of Lagos · NGUniversidad de La Rioja · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of antimicrobials in food animal (FA) production is a common practice all over the world, with even greater usage and dependence in the developing world, including Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, this practice which serves obvious economic benefits to producers has raised public health concerns over the last decades, thus driving the selection and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance and adversely impacting food safety and environmental health. This review presents the current and comprehensive antimicrobial usage practices in food animal production across SSA. We further highlighted the overall regional drivers as well as the public health, environmental, and economic impact of antimicrobial use in the production of food animals. Antimicrobial use is likely to increase with even exacerbated outcomes unless cost-effective, safe, and sustainable alternatives to antibiotics, especially probiotics, prebiotics, bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophages, vaccines, etc. are urgently advocated for and used in food animal production in SSA. These, in addition to the implementation of strong legislation on antimicrobial use, and improved hygiene will help mitigate the public health concerns associated with antimicrobial use in food animals and improve the well-being and safety of food animals and their products.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriocinsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFood SafetyPublic HealthAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriocinsAntimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial useFood animalsFood safetySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID38055165
PMCPMC10830768
OpenAlexW4389396788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.