Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055124›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2023

Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tools Aimed at Healthcare Professionals to Support Medication Reconciliation: a Systematic Review.

Pablo Ciudad-Gutiérrez, Paula Del Valle-Moreno, Santiago José Lora-Escobar, Ana Belén Guisado-Gil, Eva Rocío Alfaro-Lara

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Building an allergy reconciliation module to eliminate allergy discrepancies in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo Ciudad-GutiérrezDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Av. Manuel Siurot s/n., 41013, Seville, Spain.
Paula Del Valle-MorenoDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Av. Manuel Siurot s/n., 41013, Seville, Spain.
Santiago José Lora-EscobarDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Av. Manuel Siurot s/n., 41013, Seville, Spain.
Ana Belén Guisado-GilDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Av. Manuel Siurot s/n., 41013, Seville, Spain. anaguigil@gmail.com.
Eva Rocío Alfaro-LaraDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Av. Manuel Siurot s/n., 41013, Seville, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of health information technology available and accessible to professionals is increasing in the last few years. However, a low number of electronic health tools included some kind of information about medication reconciliation. To identify all the electronic medication reconciliation tools aimed at healthcare professionals and summarize their main features, availability, and clinical impact on patient safety. A systematic review of studies that included a description of an electronic medication reconciliation tool (web-based or mobile app) aimed at healthcare professionals was conducted. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO: registration number CRD42022366662, and followed PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed using four healthcare databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus with no language or publication date restrictions. We identified a total of 1227 articles, of which only 12 met the inclusion criteria.Through these articles,12 electronic tools were detected. Viewing and comparing different medication lists and grouping medications into multiple categories were some of the more recurring features of the tools. With respect to the clinical impact on patient safety, a reduction in adverse drug events or medication discrepancies was detected in up to four tools, but no significant differences in emergency room visits or hospital readmissions were found. 12 e-MedRec tools aimed at health professionals have been developed to date but none was designed as a mobile app. The main features that healthcare professionals requested to be included in e-MedRec tools were interoperability, "user-friendly" information, and integration with the ordering process.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMedication ReconciliationElectronicsHealth PersonnelHumansLanguageElectronic toolsHealthcare professionalsMedication reconciliationPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID38055124
PMCPMC10700201
OpenAlexW4389379420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.