ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2024
Clinical Trials and Future Outlooks of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab: A Narrative Review.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ranibizumab port delivery system for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Current evidence and surgical considerations.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Diabetic Retinopathy and Current Treatment Approaches: From Pathogenesis to Extracellular Vesicle-Based Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biodegradable polymeric microsphere formulations of full-length anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab for sustained intraocular delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Article
- Local controlled release of stabilized monoclonal antibodies.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025Article
- Advances in the molecular signaling mechanisms of VEGF/VEGFR2 in fundus neovascularization disease (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Review
- Antibody-based therapeutics and therapeutic development for diabetic retinopathy: targeting VEGF, Ang/Tie, and inflammatory pathways.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Construction of a predictive model for the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in macular edema patients based on OCT imaging: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: A Comprehensive Review of Current Treatments and Emerging Therapeutic Options.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The port delivery system (PDS) of anti-VEGF therapy provides continuous delivery of ranibizumab (RBZ). In October of 2021, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the PDS with RBZ as a treatment option for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). As the field of PDS with RBZ is progressing rapidly, this narrative review provides a much-needed overview of existing clinical trials as well as ongoing and upcoming trials investigating PDS with RBZ. The phase 2 LADDER trial reported that the mean time to first refill with RBZ PDS 100 mg/ml was 15.8 months (80% CI 12.1-20.6), and pharmacokinetic profiling revealed a sustained concentration of RBZ in serum and aqueous humor. Later, the phase 3 ARCHWAY trial reported that PDS with RBZ (100 mg/ml) refilled every 24 weeks was non-inferior to monthly intravitreal injection (IVI) with RBZ (0.5 mg) in patients with nAMD over 9 months and 2 years. However, patients with PDS had a higher rate of adverse events including vitreous hemorrhage and endophthalmitis. Patients indicate high treatment satisfaction with both PDS and IVI, but the lower number of treatments with PDS was reported as a preferred choice. Several ongoing and future clinical trials, of which details are discussed in this paper, are further exploring the potentials of PDS with RBZ. We conclude that the PDS provides continuous deliverance of RBZ and that clinical efficacy levels are non-inferior to IVI therapy for nAMD. Yet, a higher rate of adverse events remains a concerning detail for widespread implementation. Future studies are warranted to better understand which patients may benefit best from this treatment approach, if long-term efficacy can be sustained, and if safety of PDS can be further improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.