Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055111›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Re-imagining metastatic breast cancer care delivery: a patient-partnered qualitative study.

Mya L Roberson, Anna Henricks, Joshua Woods, Lesley Glenn, Julia Maues, Deltra James, Sonya Reid

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mya L RobersonGillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1106B McGavran Greenberg Hall, 135 Dauer Drive, CB#7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA. Mya_Roberson@unc.edu.
Anna HenricksVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joshua WoodsDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lesley GlennProject Life, Central Point, OR, USA.
Julia MauesGuiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships (GRASP), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Deltra JamesProject Life, Central Point, OR, USA.
Sonya ReidDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USFirst Point Scientific · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

IMProving Care After Inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) StudyU01CA254832 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CRAGUN, DEBORAH LE, PAL, TUYA · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA254832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile significant progress in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment has prolonged survival and improved prognosis, there remain substantial gaps in providing patient-centered supportive care. The specific care delivery needs for metastatic cancer differ from that of early-stage cancer due to the incurable nature and lifelong duration of the condition. The objective of this study was to assess how patients living with MBC would re-imagine cancer care delivery.

methodsThis qualitative study was conducted in partnership with patient-led organizations Guiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships (GRASP) and Project Life, a nonprofit, online wellness community founded by patients with MBC for patients living with MBC. Virtual semi-structured interviews (n = 36) were conducted with Project Life members purposively sampled from the groups' overall membership. The interview guide contained items surrounding patients' lived experiences of MBC, greatest unmet needs related to care, and perspectives on virtual wellness community involvement. Interviews were coded using two-stage deductive and inductive analysis.

resultsThree major themes for re-imagining cancer care delivery were identified, including holistic care, information needs, and conceptual shifts. Within these several subthemes emerged with patients re-imagining referrals to non-oncological services, caregiver support, acceptance of integrative medicine, streamlined clinical trial enrollment, curated quality patient resources, MBC-specific terminology and approaches, long-term life and goal-of-care planning, and patient-centered voice throughout.

conclusionPeople living with metastatic cancers have specific supportive care needs. These findings highlight patient-driven areas for re-imagination that are most salient for individuals with MBC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsIntegrative MedicineNeoplasms, Second PrimaryFemaleHumansPatient-Centered CarePatientsCancer outcomesCancer survivorshipMetastatic breast cancerQualitativeSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID38055111
PMCPMC10700428
OpenAlexW4389397722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.