ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
Coronal plane in opportunistic screening of osteoporosis using computed tomography: comparison with axial and sagittal planes.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Femoral neck-parallel reconstruction enhances correlation between CT-based measurements and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis assessment.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Standardizing attenuation across tube voltages and vertebral levels for opportunistic osteoporosis screening on low-dose chest CT.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- The association between bone density evaluated on CT or MRI versus the gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the lumbar spine and hip: a meta-analysis.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Value of Opportunistic CT-Based Bone Density Assessment in Patients with and Without Sacral Insufficiency Fractures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Regions of interest in opportunistic computed tomography-based screening for osteoporosis: impact on short-term in vivo precision.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Opportunistic Osteoporosis Assessment and Fracture Risk Determination Using Cancellous Density Measurement in Hounsfield Units of Native Lumbar Computed Tomography Images-A Comparative Study with Conventional Bone Density Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Cancellous Bone Density from C3 to L5 in 11 Body Donors: CT Versus Micro-CT Measurements.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the coronal plane with axial and sagittal planes in opportunistic screening of osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 100 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent both lumbar spine CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within 3 months were included. Osteoporosis was diagnosed based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry results. The CT number was measured at the center of the vertebral body in coronal, axial, and sagittal planes. To compare the coronal plane with axial and sagittal planes in diagnosing osteoporosis, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were compared and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The optimal cutoff values were calculated using Youden's index.
resultsThe AUC of the coronal plane (0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.89) was not significantly different from that of the axial plane (0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.87; P = 0.39) and that of the sagittal plane (0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87; P = 0.68). Excellent concordance rates were observed between coronal and axial planes with ICC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96) and between coronal and sagittal planes with ICC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96). The optimal cutoff values for the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes were 110, 112, and 112 HU, respectively.
conclusionThe coronal plane does not significantly differ from axial and sagittal planes in opportunistic screening of osteoporosis. Thus, the coronal plane as well as axial and sagittal planes can be used interchangeably in measuring bone mineral density using CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.