Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38055037›Full record

Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Deep learning prediction of curve severity from rasterstereographic back images in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Martina Minotti, Stefano Negrini, Andrea Cina, Fabio Galbusera, Fabio Zaina, Tito Bassani

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Repeatability and intra and interrater reproducibility of the DIPA-S eHealth© capture and analysis system for clinical assessment of scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina MinottiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Stefano NegriniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Andrea CinaSpine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabio GalbuseraSpine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabio ZainaISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Milan, Italy.
Tito BassaniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. tito.bassani@grupposandonato.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-1565
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITETH Zurich · CHIstituto Scientifico Italiano Colonna Vertebrale · ITSchulthess-Klinik · CHUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiation-free systems based on dorsal surface topography can potentially represent an alternative to radiographic examination for early screening of scoliosis, based on the ability of recognizing the presence of deformity or classifying its severity. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks in directly predicting the Cobb angle from rasterstereographic images of the back surface in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

methodsTwo datasets, comprising a total of 900 individuals, were utilized for model training (720 samples) and testing (180). Rasterstereographic scans were performed using the Formetric4D device. The true Cobb angle was obtained from radiographic examination. The best model configuration was identified by comparing different network architectures and hyperparameters through cross-validation in the training set. The performance of the developed model in predicting the Cobb angle was assessed on the test set. The accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity (non-scoliotic, mild, and moderate category) based on Cobb angle was evaluated as well.

resultsThe mean absolute error in predicting the Cobb angle was 6.1° ± 5.0°. Moderate correlation (r = 0.68) and a root-mean-square error of 8° between the predicted and true values was reported. The overall accuracy in classifying scoliosis severity was 59%.

conclusionDespite some improvement over previous approaches that relied on spine shape reconstruction, the performance of the present fully automatic application is below that of radiographic evaluation performed by human operators. The study confirms that rasterstereography cannot be considered a valid non-invasive alternative to radiographic examination for clinical purposes.

Indexed as

AnthropometryDeep LearningPhotogrammetryPredictive Learning ModelsScoliosisSpineAdolescentChildClinical Studies as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexAdolescentsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningRasterstereographyScoliosis

Identifiers

PMID38055037
OpenAlexW4389389573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.