ArticleJournal of neurology2024
A retrospective study of accuracy and usefulness of electrophysiological exercise tests.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myotonia: Recognition, Evaluation, and Differential Diagnosis.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to determine the usefulness of electrophysiological exercise tests. The significance of slightly abnormal exercise tests was also examined.
methodsWe identified all the patients who had undergone exercise testing between February 2007 to June 2022 in Tampere University Hospital, Finland. Their medical records after diagnostic workup and exercise test reports were reviewed. A binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between positive test result in short exercise test, long exercise test, or short exercise test with cooling and genetically confirmed skeletal muscle channelopathy or myotonic disorder.
resultsWe identified 256 patients. 27 patients were diagnosed with nondystrophic myotonia, periodic paralysis, myotonic dystrophy type 1, myotonic dystrophy type 2, or other specified myopathy. 14 patients were suspected to have a skeletal muscle channelopathy, but pathogenic variants could not be identified. The remaining 215 patients were diagnosed with other conditions than skeletal muscle channelopathy or myotonic disorder. The combined sensitivity of exercise tests was 59.3% and specificity 99.1%. Abnormal exercise test result was associated with increased risk of skeletal muscle channelopathy or myotonic disorder (OR 164.3, 95% CI 28.3-954.6, p < 0.001).
conclusionsElectrophysiological exercise test is not optimal to exclude skeletal muscle channelopathy. It may be useful if a skeletal muscle channelopathy is suspected and genetic testing is negative or indeterminate and further evidence is required. Slightly abnormal exercise test results are possible in various conditions and result from different aetiologies. There is a demand for neurophysiological studies with higher sensitivity to detect skeletal muscle channelopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.