SynthesisActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2023
Outcome of simultaneous bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indications and outcomes in bi-unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Histopathological Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients With Advanced Gonarthrosis.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025Article
- Current status of bicompartmental arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimSimultaneous medial and lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) could be treated with bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (Bi-UKA) as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The present systematic review aims to assess if simultaneous Bi-UKA is a feasible option for treating medial and lateral tibiofemoral OA. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed to find studies that reported on the outcome of simultaneous Bi-UKA for both medial and lateral tibiofemoral OA.
resultsSeven studies were considered eligible for inclusion in the present systematic review. Intraoperative fractures occurred 8 times. Overall, there were 22 revisions of the prosthetic components for any reason with a survival rate that ranged from 83 to 100%. Of these, 16 revisions were for the aseptic loosening of the prosthetic components. Out of 302 surgeries, three were revised due to symptomatic OA progression in the patello-femoral joint. All clinical scores improved at the latest follow-up compared to preoperative values. Moreover, there were no differences in clinical scores of Bi-UKA compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or medial UKA plus patello-femoral prosthesis. Whereas, compared to TKA, Bi-UKA patients had comparable or superior scores. Finally, the Bi-UKA group had a significantly shorter hospital stay compared to the TKA group.
conclusionsThe use of simultaneous Bi-UKA is a valid option to address bicompartmental knee OA in selected patients with low intraoperative fracture rate, low revision rate, satisfactory clinical outcome, and fast recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.