Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38054416›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2023

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device to treat abnormal uterine bleeding; not one treatment option fits all.

Zeliha Atak, Sakine Rahımlı Ocakoğlu, Gökhan Ocakoğlu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeliha AtakClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4876-0573
Sakine Rahımlı OcakoğluClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-9489
Gökhan OcakoğluDepartment of Biostatistics, Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1114-6051
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRBursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Initially, medical treatment options are preferred in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) who are hemodynamically stable. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) in reducing bleeding symptoms in patients with AUB stratified by underlying pathology. Material and Methods: In line with the polyp, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, malignancy (and hyperplasia), coagulopathy, ovulatory disorders, endometrial, iatrogenic and not otherwise classified classification system, patients who were administered LNG-IUD due to adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia, leiomyoma and AUB due to not otherwise classified causes were included in the study. Results: A total of 172 otherwise patients with a mean age of 42.58±5.00 years were included. The distributions in the adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia, leiomyoma and otherwise unclassified groups were 30.8%, 12.8%, 26.2%, and 30.2%, respectively. Overall effectiveness of LNG-IUD in reducing menstrual bleeding was 82%. The proportion whose bleeding decreased was 95.50% in the endometrial hyperplasia group, 88.70% in the adenomyosis group, 55.60% in the leiomyoma group and 92.30% in the not otherwise classified group. The power of the current study was 99%. The efficacy of LNG-IUD was significantly less in the leiomyoma group (p<0.05) and thus this group were more likely to require surgical intervention. The overall incidence of spotting was 50%. Amenorrhea developed in 14% of patients. Conclusion: While LNG-IUD was more effective in reducing symptoms of AUB in patients with adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia and not otherwise classified causes, LNG-IUD was less effective in cases of leiomyoma.

Indexed as

Abnormal uterine bleedingadenomyosisendometrial hyperplasialeiomyomalevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device

Identifiers

PMID38054416
PMCPMC10702264
OpenAlexW4389387830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.