Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38054359›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2024

Background matching can reduce responsiveness of jumping spiders to stimuli in motion.

Min Tan, Jeremiah Y O Chan, Long Yu, Eunice J Tan, Daiqin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prey movement, size, and glossiness interact to impact praying mantid attack behaviors.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min TanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore117543.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-5297
Jeremiah Y O ChanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore117543.ORCID 0009-0008-2454-2177
Long YuCentre for Behavioural Ecology & Evolution, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5675-1864
Eunice J TanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore117543.ORCID 0000-0003-1667-3958
Daiqin LiDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore117543.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-7734

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore A-0008615-00-00National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872229Singapore Ministry of Education A-0008615-00-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion and camouflage were previously considered to be mutually exclusive, as sudden movements can be easily detected. Background matching, for instance, is a well-known, effective camouflage strategy where the colour and pattern of a stationary animal match its surrounding background. However, background matching may lose its efficacy when the animal moves, as the boundaries of the animal become more defined against its background. Recent evidence shows otherwise, as camouflaged objects can be less detectable than uncamouflaged objects even while in motion. Here, we explored whether the detectability of computer-generated stimuli varies with the speed of motion, background (matching and unmatching) and size of stimuli in six species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Our results showed that, in general, the responsiveness of all six salticid species tested decreased with increasing stimulus speed regardless of whether the stimuli were conspicuous or camouflaged. Importantly, salticid responses to camouflaged stimuli were significantly lower compared with those to conspicuous stimuli. There were significant differences in motion detectability across species when the stimuli were conspicuous, suggesting differences in visual acuity in closely related species of jumping spiders. Furthermore, small stimuli elicited significantly lower responses than large stimuli across species and speeds. Our results thus suggest that background matching is effective even when stimuli are in motion, reducing the detectability of moving stimuli.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionSpidersAnimalsMotionMovementVisual AcuityBackground matchingCamouflageJumping spidersMovementSalticidaeVisual acuityVisual responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID38054359
PMCPMC10906486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.