Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38054180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Self-pacing ameliorates recall deficit when listening to vocoded discourse: a cochlear implant simulation.

Thomas A Hansen, Ryan M O'Leary, Mario A Svirsky, Arthur Wingfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas A HansenDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Ryan M O'LearyDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Mario A SvirskyDepartment of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Arthur WingfieldDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.

Funding

Cochlear implants and listening effort: the interaction of cognitive and sensory constraintsR01DC016834 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Jonathan E Peelle, Mario A Svirsky · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In spite of its apparent ease, comprehension of spoken discourse represents a complex linguistic and cognitive operation. The difficulty of such an operation can increase when the speech is degraded, as is the case with cochlear implant users. However, the additional challenges imposed by degraded speech may be mitigated to some extent by the linguistic context and pace of presentation. Methods: An experiment is reported in which young adults with age-normal hearing recalled discourse passages heard with clear speech or with noise-band vocoding used to simulate the sound of speech produced by a cochlear implant. Passages were varied in inter-word predictability and presented either without interruption or in a self-pacing format that allowed the listener to control the rate at which the information was delivered. Results: Results showed that discourse heard with clear speech was better recalled than discourse heard with vocoded speech, discourse with a higher average inter-word predictability was better recalled than discourse with a lower average inter-word predictability, and self-paced passages were recalled better than those heard without interruption. Of special interest was the semantic hierarchy effect: the tendency for listeners to show better recall for main ideas than mid-level information or detail from a passage as an index of listeners' ability to understand the meaning of a passage. The data revealed a significant effect of inter-word predictability, in that passages with lower predictability had an attenuated semantic hierarchy effect relative to higher-predictability passages. Discussion: Results are discussed in terms of broadening cochlear implant outcome measures beyond current clinical measures that focus on single-word and sentence repetition.

Indexed as

discourse memorylinguistic contextnoise-band vocodingself-paced listeningsemantic hierarchy effect

Identifiers

PMID38054180
PMCPMC10694252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.