ArticleOphthalmology science
Potential Biomarkers for Noninfectious Scleritis Identified by Serum and Tear Fluid Proteomics.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Scleritis is an extremely painful and potentially blinding inflammation of the sclera with unknown pathogenesis and unpredictable course. To gain insight in its disease process and identify biomarker candidates, we performed extensive proteomics in serum and tear fluid. Design: Prospective multicenter cohort study. Participants: A total of 121 patients with noninfectious scleritis (of which 39 active cases), 30 healthy controls, and 23 disease controls (uveitis and rheumatoid arthritis) were enrolled in the Netherlands from 2020 to 2022. Methods: Serum, tear fluid of both eyes, and clinical data were gathered. The level of 368 inflammatory proteins was measured using proximity extension assays. Results were validated in an independent cohort of 15 patients with scleritis, and using addressable laser bead immunoassay, or enzyme-linked immunoassays. In addition, we studied an extended panel of matrix metalloproteinases in tear fluid of necrotizing scleritis with addressable laser bead immunoassay. Main Outcome Measures: Statistically significant differences in the level of inflammatory proteins between patients with scleritis and control groups. Results: Proteomics revealed 18 significantly upregulated or downregulated serum proteins in active scleritis cases compared with all control groups in both the discovery cohort and the validation cohort. The most upregulated protein was nuclear migration protein nudC (NudC; Conclusions: The results of our proteomics analysis suggest a role for neurogenesis, T-cell activation, disruption of epithelial barrier, and angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of scleritis, and highlight MMP9 and NudC as biomarkers with potential clinical relevance. Funding Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.