Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38054087›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Estimating cardiac output from coronary CT angiography: an individualized compartment model in comparison to the Stewart-Hamilton method.

Jon Bjarne Leiknes, Aksel Hiorth, Jorunn Havnen, Ole Jacob Greve, Kathinka Dæhli Kurz, Alf Inge Larsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jon Bjarne LeiknesStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Aksel HiorthDepartment of Energy Resources, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Jorunn HavnenStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Ole Jacob GreveStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Kathinka Dæhli KurzStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Alf Inge LarsenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attenuation is correlated with the concentration of contrast medium (CM) in the arteries. The cardiac output (CO) affects the concentration of CM in the circulatory system; therefore, CO affects the time-density curve (TDC). Thus, estimating CO using TDC from test-bolus images acquired in computed tomography (CT) is possible. In this study, we compare two methods of estimating CO, namely, an individualized mathematical compartment model, integrating patient, contrast, and scanning factors with TDC, and the Stewart-Hamilton method based on the area under the curve of the TDC. Materials and methods: Attenuation in the aorta was measured during test-bolus in 40 consecutive patients with a clinical indication for coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Each participant underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following CCTA to validate the estimated CO. The individual compartment model used TDC in conjunction with scanning and patient-specific parameters to estimate the concentration of CM and CO over time. This was compared to the CO calculated from the area under the curve using the Stewart-Hamilton method. Results: Both CO estimated with our individualized compartment model ( Conclusion: The TDC acquired in CCTA allows for CO estimation. Both the Stewart-Hamilton method and our mathematical compartment model show moderate correlation when applied to our data, although each method has its strengths and limitations. If the majority of the TDC is known, the Stewart-Hamilton method may be more reliable, but an individual compartment model is preferable when there are insufficient data points in the TDC. Regardless, both methods can potentially increase the diagnostic information acquired from a CCTA, which is increasingly recommended in clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

angiographycardiac outputcomputed tomographycontrastestimateindividualizedmodelStewart–Hamilton

Identifiers

PMID38054087
PMCPMC10694230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.