Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053997›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2023

Preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic indicator for patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Jianxiong Zheng, Lei Peng, Shaohua Zhang, Haiyang Liao, Jiayao Hao, Song Wu, Haili Shen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cancer risk and mortality assessment in the overweight population: evaluation of single and integrated models based on inflammatory markers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianxiong Zheng *The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Lei Peng *The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Shaohua Zhang *South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Haiyang Liao *The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jiayao HaoThe Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Song WuThe Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Haili ShenThe Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a cost-efficient indicator for carcinoma prognosis. However, its utility in urothelial carcinoma (UC) prognosis is disputed. This meta-analysis aims to assess SII's prognostic value in UC. Methods: A thorough search of databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, was conducted to find studies until January 11, 2023. Eligibility criteria were applied to select studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from selected studies and compiled in a meta-analysis to gauge SII's association with survival outcomes such as overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: This analysis includes 19 studies with 12505 UC patients. It was found that high SII significantly correlated with worse OS in UC patients (HR 1.430, 95% CI 1.237-1.653, P<0.001). High SII values also linked with poorer CSS (HR 1.913, 95% CI 1.473-2.485, P<0.001), RFS (HR 1.240, 95% CI 1.097-1.403, P=0.001), and PFS (HR 1.844, 95% CI 1.488-2.284, P<0.001) compared to low SII values. Subgroup analysis revealed SII's consistent prognostic value in UC across races, carcinoma types, sample sizes, and SII cut-off values, suggesting its potential as a prognostic indicator in UC patients. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests SII as a promising, cost-efficient predictor in UC patients. This meta-analysis indicates SII's potential as a valuable prognostic tool in UC patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=307643, identifier CRD42022307643.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansInflammationPrognosisProportional Hazards Modelsbladder carcinomameta-analysisprognostic factorsSIIsystemic immune-inflammation indexupper tract urothelial carcinomaurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38053997
PMCPMC10694229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.