Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053963›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2023

Analysis of Fluency of Movement in Parkour Using a Video and Inertial Measurement Unit Technology.

Francesco Feletti, Cristian Bracco, Takeko Maria Molisso, Lorenzo Bova, Andrea Aliverti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco FelettiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/000-0002-3621-3871
Cristian BraccoDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Takeko Maria MolissoDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo BovaDepartment of Industrial Engineering (DII), University of Padua, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-7923
Andrea AlivertiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2950-0231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluency is a movement parameter combining smoothness and hesitation, and its objective measurement may be used to determine the effects of practice on sports performance. This study aimed to measure fluency in parkour, an acrobatic discipline comprising complex non-cyclical movements, which involves fluency as a critical aspect of performance. Inter-individual fluidity differences between advanced and novice athletes as well as intra-individual variations of fluency between different parts and subsequent repetitions of a path were addressed. Seventeen parkour participants were enrolled and divided into two groups based on their experience. We analysed signals captured from an inertial measurement unit fixed on the back of the pelvis of each participant during three consecutive repetitions of a specifically designed parkour routine under the guidance of video analysis. Two fluency parameters, namely smoothness and hesitation, were measured. Smoothness was calculated as the number of inflexions on the so-called jerk graph; hesitation was the percentage of the drop in the centre of mass velocity. Smoothness resulted in significantly lower values in advanced athletes (mean: 126.4; range: 36-192) than in beginners (mean: 179.37; range: 98-272) during one of the three motor activities (p = 0.02). A qualitative analysis of hesitation showed that beginner athletes tended to experience more prominent velocity drops and negative deflection than more advanced athletes. In conclusion, a system based on a video and an inertial measurement unit is a promising approach for quantification and the assessment of variability of fluency, and it is potentially beneficial to guide and evaluate the training process.

Indexed as

athletic gesturesinjurymotor skillssports sciencetraining

Identifiers

PMID38053963
PMCPMC10694727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.