Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053958›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2023

Visual Information in Basketball Jump-Shots: Differences between Youth and Adult Athletes.

Marques Rui, Martins Fernando, Gomes Ricardo, Diogo V Martinho, Mendes Rui, Sarah A Moore, Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva, Dias Gonçalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marques RuiUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6696-8861
Martins FernandoInstituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1812-2300
Gomes RicardoInstituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-1560
Diogo V MartinhoUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0825-4032
Mendes RuiInstituto Politécnico de Coimbra, Escola Superior de Educação de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2433-5193
Sarah A MooreFaculty of Health, School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-0199
Manuel J Coelho-E-SilvaUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-7331
Dias GonçaloUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3774-6661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basketball shooting is a complex skill that requires visual routines and trained players typically evidence a specific oculomotor pattern. This study aimed to examine visual patterns in male novice youth and professional adult players while performing a jump shot. The sample included 20 basketball players grouped as under-16 youth (n = 10) and professional adult (n = 10) players. Each participant completed 50 shots at two distances (long range: 6.80 m; middle range: 4.23 m). Eye tracking glasses were used to obtain quiet eye (QE), the number of fixations, total fixation duration, duration of first and last fixation. An independent t-test was used to assess differences between groups. Shooting accuracy given by % of efficacy indicated that under-16 players attained poorer scores at both distances: long (t = -4.75, p < 0.01) and middle (t = -2.80, p < 0.012) distance. The groups also differed in QE time (long: 600 ms vs. 551 ms; middle: 572 ms vs. 504 ms) and total duration of the fixations (long: 663 ms vs. 606 ms; middle: 663 ms vs. 564 ms) in both long and middle distance shots. Significant differences also occurred in the last fixation (long distance: t = -4.301, p < 0.01; middle distance: t = -3.656, p < 0.01) with professional adult players presenting the value of, on average, 454-458 ms, while youth shooters 363-372 ms. In summary, visual strategy differed between under-16 youth and professional adult basketball players. To support their long-term sport development, it is recommended that youth basketball players focus their attention with longer final fixation before releasing the ball to improve their shot.

Indexed as

eye trackinggaze behaviormotor performanceshooting accuracyvision

Identifiers

PMID38053958
PMCPMC10694728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.