ArticleJournal of human kinetics2023
Visual Information in Basketball Jump-Shots: Differences between Youth and Adult Athletes.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fixation control and three-point field goal percentage in female collegiate basketball players: an eye-tracking study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of Shooting Distance on Oculomotor Strategy in Basketball Shooting.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Developmental Differences in Gaze Behaviors and Performance During Basketball Free Throws in Youth Athletes.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Muscle synergy and performance characteristics during regular jump shooting in basketball players of different skill levels: a non-negative matrix factorization analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Oculomotor Scanning on Agility Performance: Gender and a Type of Team Sport Comparison.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Effects on Jump Shooting Accuracy when Using Unstable Surfaces for Functional Balance Training of Youth Basketball Players.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- AI-Powered Analysis of Eye Tracker Data in Basketball Game.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Gaze to Game: A Systematic Review of Eye-Tracking Applications in Basketball.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Arm Joint Coordination of Collegiate Basketball Athletes and Recreational Players when Shooting behind the 3-Point Line.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Association of Game-Specific Performance of Young Skilled Basketball Players with Sensorimotor Factors of Agility Skills.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Impact of Playing Experience on the Relationship between Basketball Release Velocity and Muscle Contraction Strength in Mid- and Long-Distance Jump Shots.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Basketball shooting is a complex skill that requires visual routines and trained players typically evidence a specific oculomotor pattern. This study aimed to examine visual patterns in male novice youth and professional adult players while performing a jump shot. The sample included 20 basketball players grouped as under-16 youth (n = 10) and professional adult (n = 10) players. Each participant completed 50 shots at two distances (long range: 6.80 m; middle range: 4.23 m). Eye tracking glasses were used to obtain quiet eye (QE), the number of fixations, total fixation duration, duration of first and last fixation. An independent t-test was used to assess differences between groups. Shooting accuracy given by % of efficacy indicated that under-16 players attained poorer scores at both distances: long (t = -4.75, p < 0.01) and middle (t = -2.80, p < 0.012) distance. The groups also differed in QE time (long: 600 ms vs. 551 ms; middle: 572 ms vs. 504 ms) and total duration of the fixations (long: 663 ms vs. 606 ms; middle: 663 ms vs. 564 ms) in both long and middle distance shots. Significant differences also occurred in the last fixation (long distance: t = -4.301, p < 0.01; middle distance: t = -3.656, p < 0.01) with professional adult players presenting the value of, on average, 454-458 ms, while youth shooters 363-372 ms. In summary, visual strategy differed between under-16 youth and professional adult basketball players. To support their long-term sport development, it is recommended that youth basketball players focus their attention with longer final fixation before releasing the ball to improve their shot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.