Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053911›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Understanding online assessment continuance intention and individual performance by integrating task technology fit and expectancy confirmation theory.

Abed Alkarim M Ayyoub, Belal Ahmad Abu Eidah, Zuheir N Khlaif, Mahmoud Ahmad El-Shamali, Mohammed Rajeh Sulaiman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abed Alkarim M AyyoubPsychology and Counseling Department, Faculty of Economic and Social Studies, An Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Belal Ahmad Abu EidahFaculty of Educational Science and Teachers Preparing, An Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Zuheir N KhlaifFaculty of Educational Science and Teachers Preparing, An Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Mahmoud Ahmad El-ShamaliFaculty of Educational Science and Teachers Preparing, An Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Mohammed Rajeh SulaimanBirzeit University, BirZeit, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study delves into online assessments, focusing on their numerous advantages, including reducing paper usage and alleviating concerns surrounding the security of traditional examinations. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a model delineating the interplay between factors influencing the continuance intention to use online assessments and the influence on individual performance. A quantitative approach using an online survey was used to collect data from 222 graduate students from three major Palestinian universities. The research instrument was developed based on the finding of previous studies. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to construct and validate the proposed model. The findings of this study revealed that perceived usefulness has a significant influence on the intention to continue using online assessment. The proposed model indicated that there is no direct or indirect relationship between perceived ease of use and the continuance intention to use online assessment. The main limitation of this study was its reliance on a purely quantitative approach. Therefore, a sequentional mixed methods approach van be a suggestion for future research and include all the higher education institutions in the Palestinian context.

Indexed as

Continuance intentionECTIndividual performanceOnline assessmentSatisfactionTTF

Identifiers

PMID38053911
PMCPMC10694171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.