ArticleHeliyon2023
16S rDNA profiling of Loach (
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soybean fermentation has a balancing effect on the regulation of intestinal flora. Relative research between fermented soybeans and intestinal microbiota is limited. Our aim was to explore the effects of soybean fermented fowder on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced intestinal microflora and corresponding functions in loach. 16S rDNA high-throughout sequencing was applied to estimate differences in the intestinal microbiota and predict genes function. Analysis of the overall of sequencing data showed that the ratio of Effective Tags in both the control group and the treatment group was greater than 80 %. Based on six major classifications involved in the phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species, we acquired the changes in the composition of intestinal microorganisms after the supplement of soybean fermented powder. These results showed that the dominant bacteria in the two groups were basically distinct at different levels. Alpha diversity analysis indicated that the microbial richness and uniformity of soybean fermented powder decreased compared to the control group. PICRUSt and Taxfun tools analysis of intestinal flora illustrated the functional genes of the six groups were mainly involved in metabolism, genetic information processing, cellular processes, environmental information processing, and human diseases at the level 1. These data clearly demonstrated the effect of soybean fermented powder on the gut microbiome. Not only that, it provides new ideas and insights for achieving high-quality utilization of soybean fermented powder. The potential mechanisms of soybean fermented powder to alter gut flora and intestinal microbiome function can further be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.