ArticleHeliyon2023
A case of olfactory neuroblastoma that presented with olfactory dysfunction after a COVID-19 diagnosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Olfactory dysfunction is associated with conditions such as respiratory tract infections, trauma, sinonasal diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there was an increase in patients complaining of olfactory dysfunctions. Many studies have reported that olfactory dysfunction is associated with coronavirus disease 2019 and that the prognosis is usually favorable. Case presentation: Recently, we experienced a patient with olfactory dysfunction, which was aggravated after a coronavirus disease 2019 diagnosis. The patient had no other medical history, and their nasal endoscopic examination demonstrated no abnormal lesions. Through a psychophysical olfactory function test, the patient was diagnosed with anosmia. A paranasal sinus computed tomography demonstrated sclerotic bony changes in the cribriform plate area. A paranasal sinus magnetic resonance image study found an approximately 3.5 cm-sized olfactory neuroblastoma in the anterior cranial fossa. Conclusions: We suggest clinicians remember the possibility of underlying intracranial lesions in patients with olfactory dysfunction even during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and understand the guidelines of magnetic resonance imaging when evaluating olfactory dysfunction patients. Furthermore, we recommend that clinicians pay attention to the history of olfactory dysfunction before the symptoms progress and making a coronavirus disease 2019 diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.