Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053776›Full record

ReviewRestorative dentistry & endodontics2023

Does minimally invasive canal preparation provide higher fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review of

Sıla Nur Usta, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Seda Falakaloğlu, Mustafa Gündoğar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07583004 (Investigation of the Effect of Different Root Canal Preparation Sizes and Remaining Tooth Structure on the Survival of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molars), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07583004 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Effect of Different Root Canal Preparation Sizes and Remaining Tooth Structure on the Survival of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsPeriapical Healing, Restoration SurvivalArmsProTaper Gold, TruNatomy file system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sıla Nur UstaDepartment of Endodontics, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9513-0841
Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal SilvaDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-8243
Seda FalakaloğluDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Health and Technology University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5230-969X
Mustafa GündoğarDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medipol, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6394-0791
Istanbul Health and Technology UniversityIstanbul Medipol University · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRUniversidade Unigranrio · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to investigate whether minimally invasive root canal preparation ensures higher fracture resistance compared to conventional root canal preparation in endodontically treated teeth (ETT). A comprehensive search strategy was conducted on the "PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus" databases, alongside reference and hand searches, with language restrictions applied. Two independent reviews selected pertinent laboratory studies that explored the effect of minimally invasive root canal preparation on fracture resistance, in comparison to larger preparation counterparts. The quality of the studies was assessed, and the risk of bias was categorized as low, moderate, or high. The electronic search yielded a total of 1,767 articles. After applying eligibility criteria, 8 studies were included. Given the low methodological quality of these studies and the large variability of fracture resistance values, the impact of reduced apical size and/or taper on the fracture resistance of the ETT can be considered uncertain. This systematic review could not reveal sufficient evidence regarding the effect of minimally invasive preparation on increasing fracture resistance of ETT, primarily due to the inherent limitations of the studies and the moderate risk of bias.

Indexed as

Apical preparation sizeFracture resistanceMinimally invasiveSystematic reviewTaper

Identifiers

PMID38053776
PMCPMC10695733
OpenAlexW4387886472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.