Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053701›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2023

Tumor treating fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: Current understanding and future perspectives.

Antonio Colamaria, Augusto Leone, Nicola Pio Fochi, Veronica Di Napoli, Guido Giordano, Matteo Landriscina, Kashyap Patel, Francesco Carbone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association of tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy with overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Nanotherapy of Glioblastoma-Where Hope Grows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Research Progress with Atractylone as an Antitumor Agent.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio ColamariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, "Riuniti" Hospital, Foggia, Italy.
Augusto LeoneDepartment of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Nicola Pio FochiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Veronica Di NapoliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Guido GiordanoUnit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Matteo LandriscinaUnit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Kashyap PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baroda Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Francesco CarboneDepartment of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This review focuses on the recently published evidence on tumor treating fields (TTFields) administered alone or in combination with locoregional and systemic options for treating glioblastoma (GBM) in the past ten years. The aim is to critically summarize the novelty and results obtained with this innovative tool, which is becoming part of the armamentarium of neurosurgeons and neuro-oncologists. Methods: A comprehensive search and analysis were conducted on pivotal studies published in the past ten years. Furthermore, all completed clinical trials, whose results were published on clinicaltrials.gov, were examined and included in the present review, encompassing both recurrent (r) and newly diagnosed (n) GBM. Finally, an additional examination of the ongoing clinical trials was also conducted. Results: Recent trials have shown promising results both in patients with nGBM and rGBM/progressive (rGBM), leading to Food and Drug Administration approval in selected patients and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons to include TTFields into current guidelines on the management of GBM (P100034/S001-029). Recently, different randomized trials have demonstrated promising results of TTFields in combination with standard treatment of n- and rGBM, especially when considering progression-free and overall survival, maintaining a low rate of mild to moderate adverse events. Conclusion: Optimal outcomes were obtained in nGBM and progressive disease. A possible future refinement of TTFields could significantly impact the treatment of rGBM and the actual standard of care for GBM, given the better safety profile and survival effects.

Indexed as

Brain tumorClinical trialGlioblastomaHigh-grade gliomaTumor treating fields

Identifiers

PMID38053701
PMCPMC10695468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.