ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Systematic review: clinical characteristics of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Peripheral nervous system involvement accompanies central nervous system involvement in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Atypical Presentation of Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis in an Elderly Male With Dominated Memory Impairment From Damascus Hospital.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Risk factors for central hypoventilation in anti-Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Autoimmune encephalitis in Latin America. Clinical features and outcomes in pediatric and adult populations: retrospective cohort of The REAL LABIC Project.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with antibody-related autoimmune encephalitis presenting with disorders of consciousness: A prospective cohort study.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Editorial: Single-cell analysis on the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Paraneoplastic Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in a Nigerian Female Teenager: A Case Report.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The number of reported cases of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis has gradually increased since its discovery in 2007, while there are no uniform treatment guidelines. Objective: To summarize the clinical characteristics of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and to analyze the factors affecting the disease prognosis. Methods: A systematic analysis of medical records was conducted, and PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. Data were extracted, analyzed, and recorded in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: This study included 472 case reports. Most patients had prodromal symptoms of about 2 weeks, including psychiatric symptoms (53.2%), flu-like symptoms (51.5%), and seizures (23.9%), among others. Poor prognoses were associated with patients who had autonomic instability ( Conclusion: When encountering patients with fever, headache, and initial psychiatric symptoms of unknown etiology, clinicians should test their CSF for antibodies to distinguish autoimmune encephalitis. Patients with autonomic instability, central hypoventilation, and ICU support had poorer prognoses. Clinicians should be aware that older patients are more likely to develop central hypoventilation, cognitive impairment, and memory impairment, while younger patients are more likely to develop seizures. The IVGC+IVIG treatment regimen has better prognoses than others. This study includes case reports, which have obvious selection bias, and there are no unified standards to measure the severity of the disease. Therefore, in the future, larger samples and randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.