Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053452›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024

An outcome-wide analysis of the effects of diagnostic labeling of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias on social relationships.

Takashi Amano, Cal J Halvorsen, Seoyoun Kim, Addam Reynolds, Clara Scher, Yuane Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Takashi AmanoDepartment of Social Work, School of Arts and Sciences, Rutgers University Newark, Newark, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1270-5019
Cal J HalvorsenSchool of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, USA.
Seoyoun KimDepartment of Sociology, Texas State University, San Marcos, USA.
Addam ReynoldsLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Clara ScherSchool of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
Yuane JiaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Studies, School of Health Professions, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, USA.

Funding

Rutgers University Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study examines how receiving a dementia diagnosis influences social relationships by race and ethnicity.

methodsUsing data from the Health and Retirement Study (10 waves; 7,159 observations) of adults 70 years and older predicted to have dementia using Gianattasio-Power scores (91% accuracy), this study assessed changes in social support, engagement, and networks after a dementia diagnosis. We utilized quasi-experimental methods to estimate treatment effects and subgroup analyses by race/ethnicity.

resultsA diagnostic label significantly increased the likelihood of gaining social support but reduced social engagement and one measure of social networks. With some exceptions, the results were similar by race and ethnicity. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that among older adults with assumed dementia, being diagnosed by a doctor may influence social relationships in both support-seeking and socially withdrawn ways. This suggests that discussing services and supports at the time of diagnosis is important for healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAgedHumansInterpersonal RelationsSocial Supportdiagnostic label of dementiaHealth and Retirement Study (HRS)outcome-wide analysispropensity score analysissocial engagementsocial networksocial support

Identifiers

PMID38053452
PMCPMC10984499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.