ArticlePediatrics2024
Increasing Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing for Adolescents in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Article in Pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAdolescents who use the emergency department are more likely to engage in high-risk sexual activity and are at an increased risk of sexually transmitted infections. We aimed to increase testing for Chlamydia and gonorrhea from 12% to 50% among adolescents presenting to our pediatric emergency department with at-risk chief complaints over 12 months.
methodsPlan-Do-Study-Act cycles were initiated in July 2020. A multidisciplinary team reviewed preexisting data and developed interventions to increase Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing in teens with at-risk complaints, including genitourinary and behavioral health complaints, and females with abdominal pain. Two categories of interventions were implemented: education and electronic medical record optimization. Process measures were the proportion of patients with a documented sexual history and the proportion of patients tested with a documented confidential phone number. Secondary outcome measures included the weekly number of positive test results and the proportion of patients testing positive who were contacted to arrange treatment. Statistical process control charts were used to examine changes in measures over time.
resultsWithin 14 months of project initiation, the proportion of at-risk patients tested increased from 12% to 59%. Teen phone number documentation remained unchanged from 23%. Sexual history documentation remained unchanged from 46%. The number of positive test results increased from 1.8 to 3.4 per month, and the proportion of patients testing positive who were contacted to arrange treatment remained unchanged at 83%.
conclusionsWe surpassed our goal and increased the proportion of at-risk patients tested for Chlamydia and gonorrhea to 59%, sustained for 4 months from the last intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.