ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Machine-learning-based methods to generate conformational ensembles of disordered proteins.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Decoding intrinsically disordered regions in biomolecular condensates.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Sampling Conformational Ensembles of Highly Dynamic Proteins via Generative Deep Learning.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Use of AI-methods over MD simulations in the sampling of conformational ensembles in IDPs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Physics-Based Machine Learning Trains Hamiltonians and Decodes the Sequence-Conformation Relation in the Disordered Proteome.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Computational Methods to Investigate Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and their Complexes.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Sampling Conformational Ensembles of Highly Dynamic Proteins via Generative Deep Learning.Research square · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins are characterized by a conformational ensemble. While computational approaches such as molecular dynamics simulations have been used to generate such ensembles, their computational costs can be prohibitive. An alternative approach is to learn from data and train machine-learning models to generate conformational ensembles of disordered proteins. This has been a relatively unexplored approach, and in this work we demonstrate a proof-of-principle approach to do so. Specifically, we devised a two-stage computational pipeline: in the first stage, we employed supervised machine-learning models to predict ensemble-derived two-dimensional (2D) properties of a sequence, given the conformational ensemble of a closely related sequence. In the second stage, we used denoising diffusion models to generate three-dimensional (3D) coarse-grained conformational ensembles, given the two-dimensional predictions outputted by the first stage. We trained our models on a data set of coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of thousands of rationally designed synthetic sequences. The accuracy of our 2D and 3D predictions was validated across multiple metrics, and our work demonstrates the applicability of machine-learning techniques to predicting higher-dimensional properties of disordered proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.