Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053311›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2024

Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.

Andriana L Christofalos, Madison Laks, Stephanie Wolfer, Elisa C Dias, Daniel C Javitt, Heather Sheridan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andriana L ChristofalosDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3057-2486
Madison LaksDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Stephanie WolferProgram in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia Research Division, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Elisa C DiasProgram in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia Research Division, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Daniel C JavittProgram in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia Research Division, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Heather SheridanDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-644X

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Reading Dysfunction in SchizophreniaR01MH121449 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JAVITT, DANIEL C. · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading fluency deficits in schizophrenia (Sz) have been attributed to dysfunction in both lower-level, oculomotor processing and higher-level, lexical processing, according to the two-hit deficit model. Given that prior work examining reading deficits in individuals with Sz has primarily focused on single-line and single-word reading tasks, eye movements that are unique to passage reading, such as return-sweep saccades, have not yet been examined in Sz. Return-sweep saccades are large eye movements that are made when readers move from the end of one line to the beginning of the next line during natural passage reading. Examining return-sweeps provides an opportunity to examine lower-level, oculomotor deficits during reading under circumstances when upcoming higher-level, lexical information is not available for visual processing because visual acuity constraints do not permit detailed lexical processing of line-initial words when return-sweeps are programmed. To examine the source of reading deficits in Sz, we analysed an existing data set in which participants read multi-line passages with manipulations to line spacing. Readers with Sz made significantly more return-sweep targeting errors followed by corrective saccades compared with healthy controls. Both groups showed similar effects of line spacing on return-sweep targeting accuracy, suggesting similar sensitivities to visual crowding during reading. Furthermore, the patterns of fixation durations in readers with Sz corroborate prior work indicating reduced parafoveal processing of upcoming words. Together, these findings suggest that lower-level visual and oculomotor dysfunction contribute to reading deficits in Sz, providing support for the two-hit deficit model.

Indexed as

ReadingSchizophreniaAdultEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOcular Motility DisordersPattern Recognition, VisualSaccadesYoung Adulteye movementsparafoveal processingreadingreturn-sweep saccadessaccade targetingSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38053311
PMCPMC11214805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.