Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053301›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2024

Compound Absorption in Polymer Devices Impairs the Translatability of Preclinical Safety Assessments.

Aurino M Kemas, Reza Zandi Shafagh, Nayere Taebnia, Maurice Michel, Lena Preiss, Ute Hofmann, Volker M Lauschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Towards advanced regenerative therapeutics to tackle cardio-cerebrovascular diseases.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aurino M KemasDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.
Reza Zandi ShafaghDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.
Nayere TaebniaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.
Maurice MichelDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.
Lena PreissDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.
Ute HofmannDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Volker M LauschkeDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-6204

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 875510Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse VC-2021-0026Vetenskapsrådet 2021-02801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organotypic and microphysiological systems (MPS) that can emulate the molecular phenotype and function of human tissues, such as liver, are increasingly used in preclinical drug development. However, despite their improved predictivity, drug development success rates have remained low with most compounds failing in clinical phases despite promising preclinical data. Here, it is tested whether absorption of small molecules to polymers commonly used for MPS fabrication can impact preclinical pharmacological and toxicological assessments and contribute to the high clinical failure rates. To this end, identical devices are fabricated from eight different MPS polymers and absorption of prototypic compounds with different physicochemical properties are analyzed. It is found that overall absorption is primarily driven by compound hydrophobicity and the number of rotatable bonds. However, absorption can differ by >1000-fold between polymers with polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) being most absorptive, whereas polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and thiol-ene epoxy (TEE) absorbed the least. Strikingly, organotypic primary human liver cultures successfully flagged hydrophobic hepatotoxins in lowly absorbing TEE devices at therapeutically relevant concentrations, whereas isogenic cultures in PDMS devices are resistant, resulting in false negative safety signals. Combined, these results can guide the selection of MPS materials and facilitate the development of preclinical assays with improved translatability.

Indexed as

PolymersDimethylpolysiloxanesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLiverPolytetrafluoroethyleneDimethylpolysiloxanesPolymersPolytetrafluoroethylenedrug developmentlogPmicrophysiological systempolymer‐drug interactionsmall molecule absorption

Identifiers

PMID38053301
PMCPMC11469150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.