ArticleGenome biology2023
Integration of datasets for individual prediction of DNA methylation-based biomarkers.
Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic indicators of body mass predict survival outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: patient cohort analysis.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Regulation of Production Traits in Ruminants: Implications for Breeding and Selection.Biology · 2026Review
- What's counted counts: the implications of underrepresentation for the application of epigenetic clocks in diverse populations.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- DNA methylation-based predictors of metabolic traits in Scottish and Singaporean cohorts.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Methylome-wide studies of six metabolic traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Integration of datasets for individual prediction of DNA methylation-based biomarkers.Genome biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpigenetic scores (EpiScores) can provide biomarkers of lifestyle and disease risk. Projecting new datasets onto a reference panel is challenging due to separation of technical and biological variation with array data. Normalisation can standardise data distributions but may also remove population-level biological variation.
resultsWe compare two birth cohorts (Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936 - n
conclusionsNormalisation methods returning similar EpiScores, whether cohorts are analysed separately or together, will minimise technical variation when projecting new data onto a reference panel. These methods are important for cases where raw data is unavailable and joint normalisation of cohorts is computationally expensive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.