Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053183›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

Histogram analysis of mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging in predicting consistency of meningiomas.

Lingmin Zheng, Peirong Jiang, Danjie Lin, Xiaodan Chen, Tianjin Zhong, Rufei Zhang, Jing Chen, Yang Song, Yunjing Xue, Lin Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lingmin Zheng *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Peirong Jiang *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Danjie Lin *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Xiaodan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Tianjin ZhongDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Rufei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Yang SongMR Scientific Marketing, Healthineers Ltd, Siemens, Shanghai, China.
Yunjing XueDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. xueyunjing@126.com.
Lin LinDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. linlin@fjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-1848
Fujian Medical University · CNSiemens (China) · CN

Funding

Excellent Young Scholars Cultivation Project of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital 2022XH035, 2022XH014Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project 2020GGA039Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2022J011052Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University 2019QH1062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consistency of meningiomas is critical to determine surgical planning and has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. Our aim was to compare mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential MR diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting the consistency of meningiomas before surgery.

methodsForty-seven consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed meningiomas were prospectively enrolled in this study. Two senior neurosurgeons independently evaluated tumour consistency and classified them into soft and hard groups. A volume of interest was placed on the preoperative MR diffusion images to outline the whole tumour area. Histogram parameters (mean, median, 10th percentile, 90th percentile, kurtosis, skewness) were extracted from 6 different diffusion maps including ADC (DWI), D*, D, f (IVIM), alpha and DDC (SEM). Comparisons between two groups were made using Student's t-Test or Mann-Whitney U test. Parameters with significant differences between the two groups were included for Receiver operating characteristic analysis. The DeLong test was used to compare AUCs.

resultsDDC, D* and ADC 10th percentile were significantly lower in hard tumours than in soft tumours (P ≤ 0.05). The alpha 90th percentile was significantly higher in hard tumours than in soft tumours (P < 0.02). For all histogram parameters, the alpha 90th percentile yielded the highest AUC of 0.88, with an accuracy of 85.10%. The D* 10th percentile had a relatively higher AUC value, followed by the DDC and ADC 10th percentile. The alpha 90th percentile had a significantly greater AUC value than the ADC 10th percentile (P ≤ 0.05). The D* 10th percentile had a significantly greater AUC value than the ADC 10th percentile and DDC 10th percentile (P ≤ 0.03).

conclusionHistogram parameters of Alpha and D* may serve as better imaging biomarkers to aid in predicting the consistency of meningioma.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaArea Under CurveDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBi-exponential modelDiffusion MRIMeningiomaStretched-exponential modelTumour consistency

Identifiers

PMID38053183
PMCPMC10696773
OpenAlexW4389340709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.