Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053165›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2023

Prenatal BRCA1 epimutations contribute significantly to triple-negative breast cancer development.

Oleksii Nikolaienko, Hans P Eikesdal, Elisabet Ognedal, Bjørnar Gilje, Steinar Lundgren, Egil S Blix, Helge Espelid, Jürgen Geisler, Stephanie Geisler, Emiel A M Janssen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genes · 2026
    Article
  3. Prevalence ofJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer on the Rise or…? [Letter].Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Oleksii NikolaienkoK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5910-4934
Hans P EikesdalK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Elisabet OgnedalK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4775-0661
Bjørnar GiljeDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6777-4081
Steinar LundgrenCancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Egil S BlixDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Helge EspelidDepartment of Surgery, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway.
Jürgen GeislerDepartment of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Stephanie GeislerDepartment of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Emiel A M JanssenDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-5396
Synnøve YndestadK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7835-3031
Laura MinsaasK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0009-0008-9775-3880
Beryl LeirvaagK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Reidun LillestølK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0009-0009-7453-1027
Stian KnappskogK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-1655
Per E LønningK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. per.lonning@helse-bergen.no.ORCID 0000-0002-8890-6303
Haukeland University Hospital · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOAkershus University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOPrivatsykehuset Haugesund · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNormal cell BRCA1 epimutations have been associated with increased risk of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the fraction of TNBCs that may have BRCA1 epimutations as their underlying cause is unknown. Neither are the time of occurrence and the potential inheritance patterns of BRCA1 epimutations established.

methodsTo address these questions, we analyzed BRCA1 methylation status in breast cancer tissue and matched white blood cells (WBC) from 408 patients with 411 primary breast cancers, including 66 TNBCs, applying a highly sensitive sequencing assay, allowing allele-resolved methylation assessment. Furthermore, to assess the time of origin and the characteristics of normal cell BRCA1 methylation, we analyzed umbilical cord blood of 1260 newborn girls and 200 newborn boys. Finally, we assessed BRCA1 methylation status among 575 mothers and 531 fathers of girls with (n = 102) and without (n = 473) BRCA1 methylation.

resultsWe found concordant tumor and mosaic WBC BRCA1 epimutations in 10 out of 66 patients with TNBC and in four out of six patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-low expression (< 10%) tumors (combined: 14 out of 72; 19.4%; 95% CI 11.1-30.5). In contrast, we found concordant WBC and tumor methylation in only three out of 220 patients with 221 ER ≥ 10% tumors and zero out of 114 patients with 116 HER2-positive tumors. Intraindividually, BRCA1 epimutations affected the same allele in normal and tumor cells. Assessing BRCA1 methylation in umbilical WBCs from girls, we found mosaic, predominantly monoallelic BRCA1 epimutations, with qualitative features similar to those in adults, in 113/1260 (9.0%) of individuals, but no correlation to BRCA1 methylation status either in mothers or fathers. A significantly lower fraction of newborn boys carried BRCA1 methylation (9/200; 4.5%) as compared to girls (p = 0.038). Similarly, WBC BRCA1 methylation was found less common among fathers (16/531; 3.0%), as compared to mothers (46/575; 8.0%; p = 0.0003).

conclusionsOur findings suggest prenatal BRCA1 epimutations might be the underlying cause of around 20% of TNBC and low-ER expression breast cancers. Such constitutional mosaic BRCA1 methylation likely arise through gender-related mechanisms in utero, independent of Mendelian inheritance.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultBRCA1 ProteinDNA MethylationFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPromoter Regions, GeneticBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA1Constitutional epimutationEpimutationMethylationTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID38053165
PMCPMC10698991
OpenAlexW4389358551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.