Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053116›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2023

A quantitative analysis of human rights-related attitude changes towards people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities following completion of the WHO QualityRights e-training in Ghana.

Emma Poynton-Smith, Martin Orrell, Akwasi Osei, Sally-Ann Ohene, Joana Ansong, Leveana Gyimah, Caitlin McKenzie, Maria Francesca Moro, Nathalie Drew-Bold, Florence Baingana and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emma Poynton-SmithInstitute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK. Emma.Poynton-Smith@nhs.net.
Martin OrrellInstitute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK.
Akwasi OseiGhana Ministry of Health-Mental Health Authority, Accra, Ghana.
Sally-Ann OheneCharité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Joana AnsongWHO Country Office for Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Leveana GyimahNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Caitlin McKenzieNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Maria Francesca MoroColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA.
Nathalie Drew-BoldWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Florence BainganaWHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, CG, Congo.
Mauro Giovanni CartaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Priscilla TawiahGhana Ministry of Health-Mental Health Authority, Accra, Ghana.
Kwaku BrobbeyGhana Ministry of Health-Mental Health Authority, Accra, Ghana.
Michelle FunkWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing recognition of essential human rights, people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities' rights are known to be frequently violated in mental healthcare worldwide, with common use of coercive practices and limited recognition of people's right to exercise their legal capacity and make decisions for themselves on treatment and other issues affecting them. To tackle this issue, Ghana adopted the WHO QualityRights Initiative in 2019. This aims to introduce a right-based, person-centred recovery approach within the mental health care system, protecting and promoting the rights of people with mental health conditions, psychosocial, cognitive, and intellectual disabilities in the healthcare context and community.

methodsE-training (capacity-building) was provided in Ghana across a broad array of stakeholder groups including healthcare professionals, carers, and people with lived experience. The training covered legal capacity, coercion, community inclusion, recovery approach, service environment, and the negative attitudes commonly held by stakeholder groups; it was completed by 17,000 people in Ghana as of December 2021. We assessed the impact of the e-training on attitudes through comparing trainees' pre- and post-questionnaire responses on 17 items, each measured on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), such that higher scores indicated negative attitudes towards persons with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities as rights holders. Analyses were conducted on two main groups: matched pairs (417 pairs of baseline and follow-up questionnaire responses matched to a high degree of certainty), and the unmatched group (4299 individual completed questionnaire responses).

resultsWe assessed the impact of the WHO QualityRights e-training on attitudes: training resulted in highly significant attitude changes towards alignment with human rights, with scores changing by approximately 40% between baseline and follow-up. In particular, attitude changes were seen in items representing treatment choice, legal capacity, and coercion. This change was not affected by age, gender, or background experience.

conclusionsThe QualityRights e-training programme is effective in changing people's (especially healthcare professionals') attitudes towards people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities: this is a step towards mental healthcare being more with human rights-based worldwide.

Indexed as

GhanaHuman rightsPeople with disabilityTrainingWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID38053116
PMCPMC10698997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.