Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053050›Full record

SynthesisGlobalization and health2023

Systems analysis of the effects of the 2014-16 Ebola crisis on WHO-reporting nations' policy adaptations and 2020-21 COVID-19 response: a systematized review.

Jessi Hanson-DeFusco, Min Shi, Zoe Du, Ornheilia Zounon, Fidèle Marc Hounnouvi, Albert DeFusco

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Globalization and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessi Hanson-DeFuscoUniversity of Texas at Dallas, Cecil H. Green Hall 3.526, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX, 75080-3021, USA. Jessi.defusco@UTDallas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1265-8403
Min ShiUniversity of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6135-2673
Zoe DuUniversity of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Ornheilia ZounonUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
Fidèle Marc HounnouviUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
Albert DeFuscoAnaconda, Inc, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-0433
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi · BJUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent case studies indicate that the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak, one of the worst pre-2020 global biological catastrophes in modern history, helped some nations to better prepared their responses for the COVID-19 pandemic. While such national case studies explore how specific nations applied EVD-related policies in their domestic battle against the COVID-19 pandemic, there is no known study that assesses how many WHO nations learned from the West African crisis and to what scale.

objectiveApplying the policy legacies analytical framework and a systematized literature review, this research examines how prior policy experiences with the 2014-16 EVD crisis as a large-scale emergent outbreak helped to inform and to condition WHO nations to proactively prepare their national policies and health systems for future threats, including ultimately COVID-19.

methodsA systematized literature review of 803 evaluated sources assesses to what extent Ebola-affected and non-affected nations directly modified governmental health systems in relation to this warning. The study further evaluates how nations with documented Ebola-related changes fared during COVID-19 compared to nations that did not. We present a categorical theoretical framework that allows for classifying different types of national response activities (termed conditioned learning).

resultsTen (90.9%) of 11 nations that were affected by 2014-16 Ebola crisis have documented evidence of repurposing their EVD-related policies to fight COVID-19. 164 (70.0%) of 234 non-EVD-affected nations had documented evidence of specifically adapting national systems to incorporate policy recommendations developed from the 2014-16 crisis, which informed their COVID-19 responses in 2020.

conclusionsThe shock of 2014-16 EVD outbreak affected most nations around the world, whether they experienced Ebola cases. We further develop a categorical framework that helps characterised nations previous experiences with this biological catastrophe, providing a means to analyse to what extent that individual nations learned and how these EVD-related changes helped inform their COVID-19 response. Nations that demonstrated EVD-related conditioned learning nations tended to have more stringent COVID-19 responses before April 2020 and utilized documented response mechanisms developed out of the West African crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hemorrhagic Fever, EbolaDisease OutbreaksHumansPandemicsSystems AnalysisWorld Health OrganizationConditioned learningCOVID-19EbolaGlobal health policyInfectious-disease responseMixed-method analysisPreparedness and preventionSystematized reviewSystems analysis

Identifiers

PMID38053050
PMCPMC10696695
OpenAlexW4389339524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.