Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053044›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2023

Acute care models for older people living with frailty: a systematic review and taxonomy.

Thomas Knight, Vicky Kamwa, Catherine Atkin, Catherine Green, Janahan Ragunathan, Daniel Lasserson, Elizabeth Sapey

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas KnightAcute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Thomasknight@nhs.net.
Vicky KamwaAcute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Catherine AtkinAcute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Catherine GreenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Whiston Hospital, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Prescot, L35 5DR, UK.
Janahan RagunathanDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, BL4 0JR, UK.
Daniel LassersonWarwick Medical School, Professor of Acute and Ambulatory Care, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Elizabeth SapeyAcute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBBolton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBWhiston Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21015Medical Research Council MC_PC_21055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need to improve the acute care pathway to meet the care needs of older people living with frailty is a strategic priority for many healthcare systems. The optimal care model for this patient group is unclear.

methodsA systematic review was conducted to derive a taxonomy of acute care models for older people with acute medical illness and describe the outcomes used to assess their effectiveness. Care models providing time-limited episodes of care (up to 14 days) within 48 h of presentation to patients over the age of 65 with acute medical illness were included. Care models based in hospital and community settings were eligible. Searches were undertaken in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases. Interventions were described and classified in detail using a modified version of the TIDIeR checklist for complex interventions. Outcomes were described and classified using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2 and ROBINS-I.

resultsThe inclusion criteria were met by 103 articles. Four classes of acute care model were identified, acute-bed based care, hospital at home, emergency department in-reach and care home models. The field is dominated by small single centre randomised and non-randomised studies. Most studies were judged to be at risk of bias. A range of outcome measures were reported with little consistency between studies. Evidence of effectiveness was limited.

conclusionAcute care models for older people living with frailty are heterogenous. The clinical effectiveness of these models cannot be conclusively established from the available evidence.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration (CRD42021279131).

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyAgedCritical CareHumansAcute frailtyCare modelsTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38053044
PMCPMC10699071
OpenAlexW4389334173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.