Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38053017›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Prognostic value of Hematoxylin and eosin staining tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (H&E-TILs) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Jifang Zheng, Hejun Zhang, Siya Li, Zhaoxin Kang, Fei Zheng, Qiwei Yao, Xueqing Zhang, Ziyi Wu, Jiezhong Wang, Weimin Fang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Phasor-FLIM and SHG imaging for quantitative analysis of lung cancer autofluorescence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jifang Zheng *Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Hejun Zhang *Department of Pathology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Siya Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Zhaoxin KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Fei ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Qiwei YaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Xueqing ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Ziyi WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Jiezhong WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Weimin FangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Jiancheng LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Pathology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Yuangui ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. 2000cyg@fjmu.edu.cn.
Mingqiu ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China. drchenmingqiu@163.com.
Fujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy No. 2020Y2012Fujian provincial health and family planning research talent training program 2020GGB009National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Program No. 2021Scientific Research Foundation of Fujian Cancer Hospital No. 2021YN01the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82173051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) by routine hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E-TILs) are a robust prognostic biomarker in various cancers. However, the role of H&E-TILs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of H&E-TILs in ESCC treated with CCRT.

methodsThe clinical data of 160 patients with ESCC treated with CCRT in our center between Jan. 2014 and Dec. 2021 were collected and retrospectively reviewed, and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were performed. The H&E-TILs sections before CCRT were reassessed by two experienced pathologists independently. The H&E-TILs sections were classified into a positive group (+, > 10%) and a negative group (-, ≤ 10%) using 10% as the cutoff. The effects of H&E-TILs on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were explored using the Kaplan‒Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to test the differences. Multivariable analysis was performed using the Cox proportion hazards model.

resultsThe short-term response to CCRT and the OS (P < 0.001), DMFS (P = 0.001), and LRFS (P < 0.001) rates were significantly different between the H&E-TILs (+) and H&E-TILs (-) groups. Subgroup analysis showed that H&E-TILs(+) with CR + PR group had a longer survival than H&E-TILs(-) with CR + PR, H&E-TILs(+) with SD + PD and H&E-TILs(-) with SD + PD group, respectively(P < 0.001). Furthermore, based on TCGA data, patients in the high TILs group had a better prognosis than those in the low TILs group. Multivariate analyses indicated that H&E-TILs and the short-term response to CCRT were the only two independent factors affecting OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRFS simultaneously, and H&E-TILs expression was associated with an even better prognosis for those patients with CR + PR.

conclusionsH&E-TILs may be an effective and beneficial prognostic biomarker for ESCC patients treated with CCRT. Patients with H&E-TILs (+) with PR + CR would achieve excellent survival. Further prospective studies are required to validate the conclusions.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaBiomarkersChemoradiotherapyEosine Yellowish-(YS)HematoxylinHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersEosine Yellowish-(YS)HematoxylinChemoradiotherapyESCCPrognosisTILs

Identifiers

PMID38053017
PMCPMC10698938
OpenAlexW4389329819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.