Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38052929›Full record

Observational studyAdministration and policy in mental health2025

Consultation as an Implementation Strategy to Increase Fidelity of Measurement-Based Care Delivery in Community Mental Health Settings: An Observational Study.

Grace S Woodard, Elizabeth Casline, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Measurement-based care: opportunities to improve global mental health care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grace S WoodardDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA. g.woodard@miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-6914
Elizabeth CaslineNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E. Superior Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9582-9249
Jill Ehrenreich-MayDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7436-5393
Golda S GinsburgUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, 65 Kane Street Room 3022, West Hartford, CT, 06119, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-2079
Amanda Jensen-DossDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-7463

Funding

2/2-Unified Treatment of Adolescent Emotional Disorders in Community ClinicsR01MH106657 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI GINSBURG, GOLDA SUSAN · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
1/2-Unified Treatment of Adolescent Emotional Disorders in Community ClinicsR01MH106536 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI EHRENREICH-MAY, JILL, JENSEN-DOSS, AMANDA · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01MH106536NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106657NIMH NIH HHS R01MH106657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regularly administering outcome measures to clients to inform clinical decision making, referred to as measurement-based care (MBC), has the potential to improve mental health treatment due to its applicability across disorders and treatment settings. Given the utility of MBC, understanding predictors of high-fidelity MBC implementation is important. Training and consultation are widely used implementation strategies to increase the fidelity of evidence-based practice delivery but have rarely been studied with MBC. The current study will examine the relationship between time clinicians spent discussing a case in consultation ("dosage") and MBC fidelity. Thirty clinicians and 56 youth were in the MBC condition of a randomized controlled trial and completed baseline questionnaires. Consultation dosage was extracted from call notes. MBC fidelity was measured using the implementation index, which combines rates of administering and viewing questionnaires, using objective data from the online MBC system. Multi-level modeling was used. Greater consultation dosage significantly predicted a higher implementation index (ß = 0.27, SE = 0.06, p < .001). For every 30 min spent discussing a case in consultation, the case's MBC fidelity increased by 8.1%. Greater consultation dosage significantly predicted higher rates of administration (ß = 0.07, SE = 0.03, p = 0.033) and feedback report viewing (ß = 0.24, SE = 0.06, p < .001). More consultation at the case level predicts greater MBC fidelity using objective measures. The greatest impact was increasing the clinician feedback report viewing rate. The results of this study can help inform future efforts to increase the fidelity with which MBC is delivered and to make consultation as efficient and effective as possible.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnxietyCommunity mental healthConsultationDepressionEvidence-based practiceImplementation scienceMeasurement-based careYouth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.