Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38052905›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2024

Surveillance of multiple congenital anomalies; searching for new associations.

Joan K Morris, Jorieke E H Bergman, Ingeborg Barisic, Diana Wellesley, David Tucker, Elizabeth Limb, Marie-Claude Addor, Clara Cavero-Carbonell, Carlos Matias Dias, Elisabeth S Draper and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systematic method for classifying multiple congenital anomaly cases in electronic health records.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial intelligence - the next generation of sequencing?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.

Joan K MorrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK. jmorris@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7164-612X
Jorieke E H BergmanDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3929-3619
Ingeborg BarisicChildren's Hospital Zagreb, Centre of Excellence for Reproductive and Regenerative Medicine, Medical School University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Diana WellesleyClinical Genetics, University of Southampton and Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK.
David TuckerCongenital Anomaly Register & Information Service for Wales (CARIS) Public Health Knowledge and Research, Public Health Wales, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Elizabeth LimbPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Marie-Claude AddorDepartment of Woman-Mother-Child, University Medical Center CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clara Cavero-CarbonellRare Diseases Research Unit, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-6456
Carlos Matias DiasEpidemiology Department, National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisboa, Portugal.
Elisabeth S DraperDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Georg Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Luis Javier Echevarría-González-de-GaribayDepartment of Health of the Basque Government, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Miriam GattMalta Congenital Anomalies Registry, Directorate for Health Information and Research, Guardamangia, Malta.
Kari KlungsøyrDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nathalie LelongUniversité Paris Cité, CRESS, Équipe de recherche en épidémiologie obstétricale périnatale et pédiatrique (EPOPé), INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.
Karen LuytSouth West Congenital Anomaly Register, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anna Materna-KirylukPolish Registry of Congenital Malformations, Chair and Department of Medical Genetics, University of Medical Sciences, 61-701, Poznan, Poland.
Vera NelenProvincial Institute for Hygiene, Antwerp, Belgium.
Amanda NevilleCenter for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Isabelle PerthusAuvergne Registry of Congenital Anomalies (CEMC-Auvergne), Department of Clinical Genetics, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anna PieriniUnit of Epidemiology of Rare diseases and Congenital anomalies, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Hanitra Randrianaivo-RanjatoelinaService de Génétique Médicale et d'oncogénétique, Registre des Malformations Congénitales, Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France.
Judith RankinPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Anke RissmannMalformation Monitoring Centre Saxony-Anhalt, Medical Faculty Otto-von-Guericke University-Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9437-2790
Florence RougetBrittany Registry of Congenital Anomalies, CHU Rennes, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Geraldine SayersHealth Intelligence, Research and Development Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Wladimir WerteleckiOMNI-Net Ukraine Programs, Rivne, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-5864-5985
Agnieszka Kinsner-OvaskainenEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Ester GarneDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
Inserm · FRSt George's, University of London · GBBasque Government · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESHealth Service Executive · IEIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITJoint Research Centre · ITLillebaelt Hospital · DKMinistry for Health · MTNational Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge · PTNewcastle University · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLPrincess Anne Hospital · GBProvincial Institute for Hygiene · BEPublic Health Wales · GBRivne State University of Humanities · UAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many human teratogens are associated with a spectrum of congenital anomalies rather than a single defect, and therefore the identification of congenital anomalies occurring together more frequently than expected may improve the detection of teratogens. Thirty-two EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries covering 6,599,765 births provided 123,566 cases with one or more major congenital anomalies (excluding chromosomal and genetic syndromes) for the birth years 2008-2016. The EUROCAT multiple congenital anomaly algorithm identified 8804 cases with two or more major congenital anomalies in different organ systems, that were not recognized as part of a syndrome or sequence. For each pair of anomalies, the odds of a case having both anomalies relative to having only one anomaly was calculated and the p value was estimated using a two-sided Fisher's exact test. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure adjusted p values to control the false discovery rate and pairs of anomalies with adjusted p values < 0.05 were identified. A total of 1386 combinations of two anomalies were analyzed. Out of the 31 statistically significant positive associations identified, 20 were found to be known associations or sequences already described in the literature and 11 were considered "potential new associations" by the EUROCAT Coding and Classification Committee. After a review of the literature and a detailed examination of the individual cases with the anomaly pairs, six pairs remained classified as new associations. In summary, systematically searching for congenital anomalies occurring together more frequently than expected using the EUROCAT database is worthwhile and has identified six new associations that merit further investigation.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleCongenital AbnormalitiesDatabases, FactualEuropeHumansPrevalenceRegistriesSyndromeTeratogensTeratogens

Identifiers

PMID38052905
PMCPMC10999451
OpenAlexW4389341872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.